But what about 1 x 16 mode? Paul S. ----- Original Message ----- From: "norman fay" <NFAY@...> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 7:43 AM Subject: [motm] run/skip/rest(?) > In message <000d01c089f7$0206c760$023f240a@...>, Paul Schreiber > <synth1@...> writes > > (of sequencer switch suggestion) > > >That's $74 worth of switches!! > > > >Paul S. > > > IMO run/skip/rest switches for each stage is THEE essential feature on > an analogue sequencer. To explain, yr sequencer is laid out thusly: > > row 1 O O O O O O O O > > row 2 O O O O O O O O > > switch I I I I I I I I > > right? (O represents knob, I represents 3-position switch (like on for > example motm410 for lfo selection) > > when the stage's switch is in the middle, the stage runs as normal, > switch it one way, and you get a rest, IE the sequencer doesn't output a > trigger, switch it the other way, and the sequencer skips to the next > stage. > > doing it this way means you only use 8 switches = $37. Well worth it, > in fact, I'd put this over an internal clock in terms of importance. I > believe the Moog modular sequencer did this, but many others, even > including serge's fancy sequencers don't implement it, yet I believe > it's not too difficult to implement. > > You can hear what can be done with thios feature on T. Dream's "rubicon" > lp. It's a good 'un! > > that's my opinion, anyway, for those of you who give a **** ;) > > best etc > -- > norman fay > > > >
Message
Re: [motm] run/skip/rest(?)
2001-01-29 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.