MOTM

>I agree with Dave, if too much is added then it is no longer a "simple" 
>sequencer. Personally, all I would really want is 8x2 with gate time 
>(global or per step, wicever is easier for Paul to do), internal or 
>external clock and a couple of run directions (foreward, backward etc...). 
>I could spend month using just those features. I've found that more 
>features does not always mean better. Sometimes you can get lost in too 
>many options and never get anything done.

From: davevosh@...
>Reply-To: motm@yahoogroups.com
>To: motm@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [motm] No kitchen sinks in sight
>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:12:28 EST
>
>In a message dated 01-01-29 07:42:55 EST, you write:
>
><< How about a simple 16 step with 3 position switches for each step? >>
>
>
>
>i think i see pauls point on this one - a simple, "quick and dirty" 8x2
>sequencer in the short term with a review and decision process on the
>"ultimate" sequencer.  i`ve been interested to see the ideas tossed about 
>and
>so many of them are worthwhile but not in this module.  creeping 
>feature-itis
>will only slow down the delivery date and raise the price. my experiences 
>may
>be different than some but i believe that there is definitely a place for
>simple sequencer modules ( or 2 or 3..... ) even when the "kitchen sink" 
>unit
>will also be added to the system later.
>best,
>dave v.
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com