Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: Re(2): [motm] Re: Balanced/Unbalanced - P.S.

2001-02-04 by J. Larry Hendry

This is great information to have coming from someone that knows something
about it.  There is so much information out there, and not all of it good.
I never stopped to think about the difference in impedance of the two
inputs.

Would the 3 op amp solution be an inverting buffer for signal +, a
non-inverting buffer for signal -, and then the third to sum the outputs of
the first two?

Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: <jhaible@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: Re(2): [motm] Re: Balanced/Unbalanced - P.S.


> > If you are careful to match the input resistors can't you get
> > good common mode rejection with active balancing?
>
> No, you can't.

Addition: yes you can, but not with that simple one-opamp
circuit. Three opamps is much better, or even better, discrete
symmetrical frontend and then an opamp, as in (now obsolete)
SSM2017.

JH.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.