Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: New custom screens

2001-02-05 by pow333@hotmail.com

Why be so frugal with space. If we wanted to make do with a little 
space we'd have nice litte synthesizers with little chicklet sized soft 
buttons under tiny menu-filled LCD screens. Since we are those of the 
knob and switch and jack point persuasion, I'll have as many of those 
as possible, and thank you. If we can make use of the dead space 
currently vacant on the Superladder, then why not a 3U panel? If we can 
fit 3 eg's on two panels, then what increased function does an 1U 
module make possible? With the demands of functionality met, I still 
want my synth to take up a lot of real estate in my control room. I 
want people to be compelled towards it while in its vicinity, and learn 
that great size engenders great sound, and give up their puny 
insignificant little digital boxes.
Paul 

--- In motm@y..., markus <n0nspaz@l...> wrote:
> my belated votes- one of each of  the following:
> 
> 
> > > >1. Oakley Wavefolder 2U (10 votes)
> > > >2. Oakley Superladder some of you want 3U, some want 2U (7 votes)   [2u]
> > > >4. Oakley VCO 2U (4 votes)
> > > >7. Blacet Klangwerk 2U (2 votes)
> > >
> > > Am I the only one that sees the utility of a 1U 4 knob Oakley AD/AR 
> > module? I
> > > think this would be much more useful than the triple 2U version with shared
> > > AD and AR controls.
> 
> this 1u AD/AR gets my vote.
> 
> -mark

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.