Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

uSeq vs older seqs

uSeq vs older seqs

2002-12-04 by Paul Schreiber

>
> I'm curious as to your logic behind the MicroSequencer.  Why produce a
> module like this one when one can use a MIDI sequencer to achieve the
> same?

Live performance! Leave that laptop at home.

> Are you going to be coming out with an analog step sequencer with
> lot of knobs for real-time control?

The uSeq HAS real-time control, as well as 4 CV inputs. What more control could you possibly
want? A 'traditional' type lets you control tempo, note and sequence length only as fast as your
hands allow. The uSeq has over 15 different controls modifications all at the SAME time, with
panel, MIDI or CV or any combination. At the SAME time. And it quantizes, supports microtuning,
syncs to MIDI clock, has 9 patterns of 99 steps.

Bah on the older style! Bah, I say!

Paul S.
Bah Bah black sheep

Re: uSeq vs older seqs

2002-12-04 by sydilaxe

After reading the PDF, I see that the uSeq can do all that I would like it to do 
and MORE.   Although it is very different from traditional analog sequencers 
(and IMO can't really replace them), I can see a very powerful interaction 
between a tradition analog sequencer and the uSeq.   With the four inputs, 
you could route the voltage outputs of a traditional sequencer and use it as a 
"front end for the uSeq."   This would be a VERY powerful combination.  Great 
design, Paul!

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.