Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

#6683

#6683

2004-01-15 by MOTM Markk

ok...

    now I'm curious... what's the significance of module number, "6683" ???

Re: [motm] #6683

2004-01-15 by Paul Schreiber

Number of Moog modules sold, plus 1 :)

Paul S>

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "MOTM Markk" <motmmarkk@...>
To: "MOTM" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: [motm] #6683


> ok...
> 
>     now I'm curious... what's the significance of module number, "6683" ???
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>

Re: [motm] #6683

2004-01-15 by Sikorsky

the total number of moog modules sold..?
in fairness i think we *all* should get a prize for passing this
milestone..?

cheers
paul b
sheffield
uk

----- Original Message -----
From: "MOTM Markk" <motmmarkk@...>
To: "MOTM" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:07 PM
Subject: [motm] #6683


> ok...
>
>     now I'm curious... what's the significance of module number, "6683"
???
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [motm] #6683

2004-01-15 by Mike Estee

On Jan 15, 2004, at 9:06 AM, Paul Schreiber wrote:

> Number of Moog modules sold, plus 1 :)

We all love Bob Moog, no doubt, as he's made a huge contribution to 
electronic music, but he's had his signature on just about everything 
^_^ How 'bout *you* sign the module with a paint pen, or have your sig 
printed on the front panel in question? Or maybe both of ya could sign 
it ^_^

--mikes

Re: [motm] #6683

2004-01-15 by Scott Juskiw

>We all love Bob Moog, no doubt, as he's made a huge contribution to
>electronic music, but he's had his signature on just about everything
>^_^ How 'bout *you* sign the module with a paint pen, or have your sig
>printed on the front panel in question? Or maybe both of ya could sign
>it ^_^

It should be a one of a kind "signature" edition module. With gold 
plated knobs, switches, and jacks as well.

Re: #6683

2004-01-15 by Mike Marsh

Well, not to brag or anything, but *I* have a Paul S signature 190...

  :)

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Mike Estee <mikest@a...> wrote:
> 
> On Jan 15, 2004, at 9:06 AM, Paul Schreiber wrote:
> 
> > Number of Moog modules sold, plus 1 :)
> 
> We all love Bob Moog, no doubt, as he's made a huge contribution to 
> electronic music, but he's had his signature on just about 
everything 
> ^_^ How 'bout *you* sign the module with a paint pen, or have your 
sig 
> printed on the front panel in question? Or maybe both of ya could 
sign 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> it ^_^
> 
> --mikes

Re: #6683

2004-01-15 by Mike Marsh

Aw, rats!  Dilluted value...

Still sounds pretty kickin' though.

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@i...> wrote:
> I thought I had the only one.
> :)
> LH
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Mike Marsh <mmarsh@w...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:29 PM
> Subject: [motm] Re: #6683
> 
> 
> Well, not to brag or anything, but *I* have a Paul S signature 
190...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
>   :)
> 
> Mike

Re: [motm] Re: #6683

2004-01-16 by J. Larry Hendry

I thought I had the only one.
:)
LH
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mike Marsh <mmarsh@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 2:29 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: #6683


Well, not to brag or anything, but *I* have a Paul S signature 190...

  :)

Mike

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.