MOTM

kick patch redone with new symbol set:
http://www.orbelisk.com/kick2.pdf

original, for comparison:
http://www.orbelisk.com/motm-kick.pdf

full symbol set:
http://www.orbelisk.com/symbols.pdf

comments?

--mikes

I approve :)

Paul S.

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Mike Estee" <squeeker@...>
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:31 PM
Subject: [motm] anyone up for some proof reading?


> 
> kick patch redone with new symbol set:
> http://www.orbelisk.com/kick2.pdf
> 
> original, for comparison:
> http://www.orbelisk.com/motm-kick.pdf
> 
> full symbol set:
> http://www.orbelisk.com/symbols.pdf
> 
> comments?
> 
> --mikes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Nice work Mike. :-)
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Mike Estee
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:31 PM
To: MOTM List
Subject: [motm] anyone up for some proof reading?



kick patch redone with new symbol set:
http://www.orbelisk.com/kick2.pdf

original, for comparison:
http://www.orbelisk.com/motm-kick.pdf

full symbol set:
http://www.orbelisk.com/symbols.pdf

comments?

--mikes

On Saturday 11 June 2005 01:31, Mike Estee wrote:
> kick patch redone with new symbol set:
> http://www.orbelisk.com/kick2.pdf

> comments?

Looking great!

There's a typo in the comment box at the lower left, not 
sure if it's relevant. 

- Robert

I like added the labels for jacks and pots.  Subdued, but still readable.

My question now is how can I produce this type of patch diagram, given 
that I don't have Mac OS X, and OmniGraffle?

-Richard Brewster

Mike Estee wrote:

>kick patch redone with new symbol set:
>http://www.orbelisk.com/kick2.pdf
>
>original, for comparison:
>http://www.orbelisk.com/motm-kick.pdf
>
>full symbol set:
>http://www.orbelisk.com/symbols.pdf
>
>comments?
>
>--mikes
>
>  
>

Err.  That would be "I like the added labels...".  Wife refilled my wine 
glass too many times tonight.

-Richard

Richard Brewster wrote:

>I like added the labels for jacks and pots.  Subdued, but still readable.
>
>My question now is how can I produce this type of patch diagram, given 
>that I don't have Mac OS X, and OmniGraffle?
>
>-Richard Brewster
>
>Mike Estee wrote:
>
>  
>
>>kick patch redone with new symbol set:
>>http://www.orbelisk.com/kick2.pdf
>>
>>original, for comparison:
>>http://www.orbelisk.com/motm-kick.pdf
>>
>>full symbol set:
>>http://www.orbelisk.com/symbols.pdf
>>
>>comments?
>>
>>--mikes
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>  
>

Error:

You say "the decay and attack should be the same", but it should be "the
decay and RELEASE should be the same".

-Elhardt

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Richard Brewster wrote:

> I like added the labels for jacks and pots.  Subdued, but still readable.
>
> My question now is how can I produce this type of patch diagram, given that I 
> don't have Mac OS X, and OmniGraffle?

...and how does one do so without shelling out money in the first place? 
Unfortunately almost all vector graphix programs are sort of expensive, so 
there is no free solution at the moment.

For Windows and Linux people I've created a symbol set in Visio, PDF, EPS, 
and Illustrator AI format. As soon as I can figure out how I'll also do a 
conversion to SVG. I'd do a flash symbol set, but I have bigger plans for 
that platform yet...

I'm working on a start page for all this, I'll uploaded before the weekend 
is out.

I also added all the unreleased modules to the list too, I'm going to add 
the Encore & Blacet modules later next week.

--mikes

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Kenneth Elhardt wrote:

> Error:
>
> You say "the decay and attack should be the same", but it should be "the
> decay and RELEASE should be the same".

Fixed, thanks!

--mikes

One method for those not wanting to invest in any expensive software on the
PC would be to have the modules in BMP format.  You could cut and paste them
using any of the many free bitmap editors including paint.  I actually use
MGI Photosuite 8.1 (the basic version that came free with many Sony
Cameras).  But, I have seen older versions of the full version sell on ebay
for $3. These are great for BMP, JPG and GIF editing.

I make drawings for work sometimes to communicate temporary line and
substation configurations.  I do everything using bitmap since it is easy to
manipulate.  Then, I convert the finished product to PDF using Acrobat just
to optimize the file size.  But, for storing patches at home, file size
would not be such a big deal.  I was contemplating converting these
wonderful drawings that Mike made to bitmap for that purpose.  I was
wondering what size / resolution I might use.

Of course, there is nothing in any of these programs to easily produce the
nice interconnecting cables.  But, the price is right.  Just a thought.

Larry Hendry

-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Mike Estee
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:09 PM
To: Richard Brewster
Cc: MOTM List
Subject: Re: [motm] anyone up for some proof reading?


On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Richard Brewster wrote:

> I like added the labels for jacks and pots.  Subdued, but still readable.
>
> My question now is how can I produce this type of patch diagram, given
that I
> don't have Mac OS X, and OmniGraffle?

...and how does one do so without shelling out money in the first place?
Unfortunately almost all vector graphix programs are sort of expensive, so
there is no free solution at the moment.

For Windows and Linux people I've created a symbol set in Visio, PDF, EPS,
and Illustrator AI format. As soon as I can figure out how I'll also do a
conversion to SVG. I'd do a flash symbol set, but I have bigger plans for
that platform yet...

I'm working on a start page for all this, I'll uploaded before the weekend
is out.

I also added all the unreleased modules to the list too, I'm going to add
the Encore & Blacet modules later next week.

--mikes




Yahoo! Groups Links

Mike,  Your 101 needs some work.  Some of the jacks are labeled like the 100
instead of the 101.  And, the top switch is the noise/close source.   Plus,
how about adding the 100 and the 110?

Thanks
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
full symbol set:
http://www.orbelisk.com/symbols.pdf

comments?

--mikes

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, J. Larry Hendry wrote:

> Mike,  Your 101 needs some work.  Some of the jacks are labeled like the 100
> instead of the 101.  And, the top switch is the noise/close source.   Plus,
> how about adding the 100 and the 110?

Anyone have pics of the 100 & 110 posted?

Thanks for correction!
--mikes

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=38071&item=7329377524&rd=1

:-)

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, J. Larry Hendry wrote:
>
>>  Mike,  Your 101 needs some work.  Some of the jacks are labeled like the 100
>>  instead of the 101.  And, the top switch is the noise/close source.   Plus,
>>  how about adding the 100 and the 110?
>
>Anyone have pics of the 100 & 110 posted?
>
>Thanks for correction!
>--mikes
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

>Anyone have pics of the 100 & 110 posted?

http://www.tellun.com/motm/mods/motm110/motm110.html

I no have a 100.

Here is the pair of brothers.  Notice the difference between the current and
the very first MOTM graphic standard.  We got boxes around our switches, and
intermediate tick marks on our pots.
http://larry.retrosynth.com/larry/misc/101+100.jpg

Thanks again for your work.
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Estee [mailto:squeeker@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:20 PM
To: J. Larry Hendry
Cc: mikes@...; MOTM List
Subject: RE: [motm] anyone up for some proof reading?


On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, J. Larry Hendry wrote:

> Mike,  Your 101 needs some work.  Some of the jacks are labeled like the
100
> instead of the 101.  And, the top switch is the noise/close source.
Plus,
> how about adding the 100 and the 110?

Anyone have pics of the 100 & 110 posted?

Thanks for correction!
--mikes