Synth-DIY Yahoo! Groups Archives

Thread

RE: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700

2000-07-20 by Dave Bradley

Hmmm. What you really want is to control the timbre by phrase, not by
individual note. You need to run a separate synchronized sequencer to
control the switching of the 700s independent of the sequence note events.

Send your 700s and 300s to me instead of Bivins.

Dave Bradley
Principal Software Engineer
Engineering Animation, Inc.
daveb@...

Show quoted textHide quoted text

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Bivins [mailto:dbivins@...]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 1:24 PM
> To: MOTM
> Subject: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700
>
>
> So get a bunch of MOTM-700s and a CV sequencer (sequencer with voltage
> output).
>
> Run the sequence into the first 700, set the threshold in the middle so
> you're doing the equivalent of a "split point" for note values.
> Run output 1
> into a second 700, output 2 into a third 700.
>
> Keep doing this until you've divided all of your pitch values so that they
> get a separate output. Run these outputs into separate oscillator/modifier
> combos.
>
> Now you've taken a simple serial sequence and given each pitch
> value its own
> timbre.
>
> If you don't understand what I'm talking about, send me all of your
> MOTM-700s and MOTM-300s and I'll demonstrate. I'll need a lot, so everyone
> should ship them to me as soon as possible ;)
>
> David.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
> Remember the good 'ol days
> http://click.egroups.com/1/7076/6/_/529958/_/964110262/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

RE: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700

2000-07-20 by Dave Bradley

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!

Moe

Show quoted textHide quoted text

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Bivins [mailto:dbivins@...]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 2:49 PM
> To: motm@egroups.com
> Subject: RE: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700
> 
> 
> Well, that's why I made up the term "micro-hocketing" because I really do
> want to do it by note, not phrase. I don't have a word for it.
> 
> So because Bradley misunderstood me, it is twice as important 
> that you send
> the 700s and 300s to me, David Bivins.
> 
> Bradley's "old school" hocketing must be prevented at all costs.
> 
> ;)
> 
> David.
>

"micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700

2000-07-20 by David Bivins

So get a bunch of MOTM-700s and a CV sequencer (sequencer with voltage
output).

Run the sequence into the first 700, set the threshold in the middle so
you're doing the equivalent of a "split point" for note values. Run output 1
into a second 700, output 2 into a third 700.

Keep doing this until you've divided all of your pitch values so that they
get a separate output. Run these outputs into separate oscillator/modifier
combos.

Now you've taken a simple serial sequence and given each pitch value its own
timbre.

If you don't understand what I'm talking about, send me all of your
MOTM-700s and MOTM-300s and I'll demonstrate. I'll need a lot, so everyone
should ship them to me as soon as possible ;)

David.

Re: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700

2000-07-20 by improv@peak.org

It seems like you could do something similar with a like,16 channel
VC-switch: it'd have 1 CV input and 16 outputs, and a gate input that on
each step of the sequencer, advances the output by one step. Does anyone
make something like this?

(if so, you can send ME all the 700's, since you won't be needing 'em ;-)

>So get a bunch of MOTM-700s and a CV sequencer (sequencer with voltage
>output).
>
>Run the sequence into the first 700, set the threshold in the middle so
>you're doing the equivalent of a "split point" for note values. Run output 1
>into a second 700, output 2 into a third 700.
>
>Keep doing this until you've divided all of your pitch values so that they
>get a separate output. Run these outputs into separate oscillator/modifier
>combos.
>
>Now you've taken a simple serial sequence and given each pitch value its own
>timbre.
>
>If you don't understand what I'm talking about, send me all of your
>MOTM-700s and MOTM-300s and I'll demonstrate. I'll need a lot, so everyone
>should ship them to me as soon as possible ;)
>
>David.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
>Remember the good 'ol days
>http://click.egroups.com/1/7076/6/_/529958/_/964110262/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------

____________________________________________
Dave Trenkel : improv@...
Minus Web Site: http://listen.to/minusmusic
Minus MP3's: http://www.mp3.com/-minus-
____________________________________________

RE: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700

2000-07-20 by David Bivins

Well, that's why I made up the term "micro-hocketing" because I really do
want to do it by note, not phrase. I don't have a word for it.

So because Bradley misunderstood me, it is twice as important that you send
the 700s and 300s to me, David Bivins.

Bradley's "old school" hocketing must be prevented at all costs.

;)

David.

Show quoted textHide quoted text

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Bradley [mailto:daveb@...]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 11:21 AM
> To: motm@egroups.com
> Subject: RE: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700
>
>
> Hmmm. What you really want is to control the timbre by phrase, not by
> individual note. You need to run a separate synchronized sequencer to
> control the switching of the 700s independent of the sequence note events.
>
> Send your 700s and 300s to me instead of Bivins.
>
> Dave Bradley
> Principal Software Engineer
> Engineering Animation, Inc.
> daveb@...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Bivins [mailto:dbivins@...]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 1:24 PM
> > To: MOTM
> > Subject: [motm] "micro-hocketing" and MOTM-700
> >
> >
> > So get a bunch of MOTM-700s and a CV sequencer (sequencer with voltage
> > output).
> >
> > Run the sequence into the first 700, set the threshold in the middle so
> > you're doing the equivalent of a "split point" for note values.
> > Run output 1
> > into a second 700, output 2 into a third 700.
> >
> > Keep doing this until you've divided all of your pitch values
> so that they
> > get a separate output. Run these outputs into separate
> oscillator/modifier
> > combos.
> >
> > Now you've taken a simple serial sequence and given each pitch
> > value its own
> > timbre.
> >
> > If you don't understand what I'm talking about, send me all of your
> > MOTM-700s and MOTM-300s and I'll demonstrate. I'll need a lot,
> so everyone
> > should ship them to me as soon as possible ;)
> >
> > David.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
> > Remember the good 'ol days
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/7076/6/_/529958/_/964110262/
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Remember four years of good friends, bad clothes, explosive chemistry
> experiments.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/7077/6/_/529958/_/964113707/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>