Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

MOTM Misc.

MOTM Misc.

2000-11-21 by weld@buffalo.com

1) Can I  gather some opinions on the 420, and 410 filters.  I currently have a
440 and I have just purchased a used 420. And may  get a 410 as well. Would just
like your opinions.

2)  Any update Paul on the MOTM 100 module. I need a noise source.

Cheers
Jim

Tkacs, Ken wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Brian Eno used to keep a few pieces of gear in the studio (I think he had a
> small Synthi machine that he particularly loved) that were BROKEN. He didn't
> even want to fix them; he said that gave them personality.
>
> Maybe that's a little extreme for some, but the point is important. Here's
> another example that you may cringe at, but makes the same point.
>
> I used to have a PAIA 1550 Strings & Thingz in my destitute youth. It was my
> first poly synth (I would pretend it was a Mellotron and my Korg MS10 a
> Minimoog...I had a good imagination...). I would write a lot of songs, and
> after a while I noticed a lot of them tended to be in the key of D minor. I
> figured my hands must just like D Minor.
>
> One day I was tweaking the chorus unit trimmers, and after that I realized
> that my songs didn't sound as good. And yet things in A-Flat Major sounded
> pretty sweet!
>
> The chorus unit was so nasty and off-balance (due either to design, limits
> of the SAD-1024 chips, or my own craftsmanship) that the two delay lines
> tended to couple and it flanged in such a way as to make the comb filter
> effect emphasize certain keys/scales! But the fact is that I just adapted my
> playing to it, and it had real character.
>
> When I got my first sampler, I thought it would be neat to sample the flat
> tone of the 1550 so that I would have that sound available, but that was a
> complete failure. The nasty choruser was the soul of that unit, such as it
> was.
>
> Now, someday, maybe virtual synths will be designed to "break down" and act
> more natural. In fact, maybe that will become a design feature to sell
> aftermarket repair jobs (wouldn't surprise me in a world where copy
> protection is king, where the end credits of every TV show are crammed with
> 4 simultaneous advertisements, and DVDs have commercials at the beginning
> that you are locked out of skipping even though you own them).
>
> With modulars, we don't have to worry about the "patch 36" syndrome! We give
> the machines personality whenever we patch them (and whenever we solder in a
> part backwards).
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   ivancu@... [mailto:ivancu@...]
> Sent:   Tuesday, 21 November, 2000 10:44 AM
> To:     motm@egroups.com
> Subject:        Re: [motm] Virtual Everything
>
> Its kind of like the Honda or Yamaha Harley-clones; if you want a Harley,
> then BUY a Harley!  It seems like music technology has become battle of the
> poseurs.  I own obscure gear because I like the challenges, specifically
> because I DON'T want to be like everyone else in terms of gear.  Whether it
> is the MOTM, or JoMox, or SidStation, or some vintage piece of crap drum
> machine that is sitting in my basement, I like to dig up sounds that don't
> sound like every dance hit out there.  PLEASE lets not get back to the days
> when I used to listen to the radio and say "oh, that's a DX7, patch number
> 36."
>

Re: [motm] MOTM Misc.

2000-11-21 by Thomas Hudson

weld@... wrote:
> 
> 1) Can I  gather some opinions on the 420, and 410 filters.  I currently have a
> 440 and I have just purchased a used 420. And may  get a 410 as well. Would just
> like your opinions.
> 
If I could only afford two MOTM modules, it would be a 900 and a 410.
The 410 comes closest to a standalone module. Everything sounds good
through a 410; string pads, guitars, voice. The pseudo-stereo effects 
are mesmerizing. 

Tomy

Re: [motm] MOTM Misc.

2000-11-21 by The Old Crow

On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Thomas Hudson wrote:

> If I could only afford two MOTM modules, it would be a 900 and a 410.
> The 410 comes closest to a standalone module. Everything sounds good
> through a 410; string pads, guitars, voice. The pseudo-stereo effects
> are mesmerizing.

  If I was limited to *one* MOTM module, it would be the 410. :)  In my
efforts to turn a Korg Polysix into a sort of PS-3200, it has turned out
to be one of the 2 keys to this goal (the other being a 2nd programmable
VCO).  Get the 410, by all means.

Crow

/**/

Re: [motm] 420 opinion

2000-11-21 by Cap'n F.M. Bleep

> 1) Can I  gather some opinions on the 420, and 410 filters.  I currently have a
> 440 and I have just purchased a used 420. And may  get a 410 as well. Would just
> like your opinions.

hmmm... well. the first night i finished assembling my first 420, i hooked
it up to an EG and my sh101 and got FAR too little sleep that night... i
completed my second one last week some time, and have had a wonderful time
trying not to blow my speakers. :)

so yeah, i really enjoy the sound of the 420, esp. at mid to high
resonance... let it be known, though, that i'm a highpass junkie, and
that's something the 420 does quite well. it's a smooth, rich highpass
sound that's lots of fun to patch cv into, esp. the -5 to +5 cv input...
you can smoothly turn your envelopes (or whatever cv signal you have)
upside down by twiddling a knob. mmm. juicy.

another benefit... if you have another filter (or if your patch requires
no filter), you can use the 420 as a three in one out mixer... of course,
who can resist the call of the freq knob? so it won't be a mixer for long.

so yeah, that's my 0.02

bleep.
out.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.