OT: More of Nate's Stupidity
2001-01-07 by Nathan Alan Hunsicker
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC
Thread
2001-01-07 by Nathan Alan Hunsicker
Is there an easy formula to figure out wavelength (in feet)? I was reading the spec sheet for some of the cabinets I have and it was stating 3-6db gains when cabinets are spaced within one half the wavelength apart. I'm trying to figure out wavelengths for frequencies 120 Hz and lower. Thanks in advance -Nate
2001-01-07 by J. Larry Hendry
Wavelength is inverse to frequency. So, low frequencies have the longest wavelengths. Radio antennas are sized to some multiple of wavelengths. ANY two bass cabinets in the same room would be within 1/2 wavelength. AM broadcast radio frequencies are in the hundreds of feet. So, audio would be MANY times that. Larry H
----- Original Message ----- From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker <nate@...> To: MOTM Newsgroup <motm@egroups.com> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 9:15 PM Subject: [motm] OT: More of Nate's Stupidity Is there an easy formula to figure out wavelength (in feet)? I was reading the spec sheet for some of the cabinets I have and it was stating 3-6db gains when cabinets are spaced within one half the wavelength apart. I'm trying to figure out wavelengths for frequencies 120 Hz and lower. Thanks in advance -Nate
2001-01-07 by sikorsky
> From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker <nate@...> > Is there an easy formula to figure out wavelength (in feet)? I was > reading the spec sheet for some of the cabinets I have and it was > stating 3-6db gains when cabinets are spaced within one half the > wavelength apart. I'm trying to figure out wavelengths for frequencies > 120 Hz and lower. Thanks in advance -Nate if i remember correctly (after hopping around the room in agony trying to remember this one), the formula is: v = fw v is velocity of sound in air at sea level at 20 degrees c in metres per second (344m/s in this case) f is frequency in hz w (or an inverse y which i can't find on my keyboard, pronounced landa) is wavelength in metres to swap the formula around, w = v/f or w = 344/120 so the wavelength at 120Hz is 286cm does anyone want to back me up on this..? cheers paul b
2001-01-07 by jwbarlow@aol.com
In a message dated 1/6/2001 7:26:25 PM, jlarryh@... writes: >AM >broadcast radio frequencies are in the hundreds of feet. Yeah, but radio waves travel a bit faster than sound waves (now who's the Stooge!). >So, audio would >be >MANY times that. Just off the top of my head I think the speed of sound (at room temp and near sea level) would be about 750 mph. And 750 mph = about 1100 fps (given 750/3600 = 0.208 mps and 0.208 * 5280 = 1100 fps). So a 1 Hz "tone" would have a wavelength of 1100 feet and a 2 Hz "tone" would have length of 550 feet. So a 20 Hz tone would have a wavelength of about 55 feet and a 30 Hz tone (only half way up the first octave of good human hearing) would be about 36.7 feet. Now a "fun" experiment: Put a 1.1 KHz sine wave through your stereo monitoring system (or stereo for that matter) which will have a wavelength of about one foot. It needs to be a bit loud (I mean not quiet). Now, slowly walk around the room (or slowly move your head around) and you'll hear the peaks and troughs of the sound pressure waves. So Wavelength = velocity of sound (in the given medium)/ frequency JB
2001-01-07 by J. Larry Hendry
Right you are JB. I was describing the "electrical signal" wavelength (like a stupid stooge). Larry H BTW, that reminds me of a question a friend of mine (guitar player) asked me in high school. I was always the technical guy in the band. But, this guy was a real musician and knew the value of a good delay. He want to know if he took a lot of wire and rolled it up inside his speaker cabinet if he could get a delay. I said, well not much delay or a LOT of wire. I got a good chuckle out of that one.
----- Original Message ----- From: <jwbarlow@...> To: <motm@egroups.com> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 11:09 AM Subject: Re: [motm] OT: More of Nate's Stupidity In a message dated 1/6/2001 7:26:25 PM, jlarryh@... writes: >AM >broadcast radio frequencies are in the hundreds of feet. Yeah, but radio waves travel a bit faster than sound waves (now who's the Stooge!). >So, audio would >be >MANY times that. Just off the top of my head I think the speed of sound (at room temp and near sea level) would be about 750 mph. And 750 mph = about 1100 fps (given 750/3600 = 0.208 mps and 0.208 * 5280 = 1100 fps). So a 1 Hz "tone" would have a wavelength of 1100 feet and a 2 Hz "tone" would have length of 550 feet. So a 20 Hz tone would have a wavelength of about 55 feet and a 30 Hz tone (only half way up the first octave of good human hearing) would be about 36.7 feet. Now a "fun" experiment: Put a 1.1 KHz sine wave through your stereo monitoring system (or stereo for that matter) which will have a wavelength of about one foot. It needs to be a bit loud (I mean not quiet). Now, slowly walk around the room (or slowly move your head around) and you'll hear the peaks and troughs of the sound pressure waves. So Wavelength = velocity of sound (in the given medium)/ frequency JB
2001-01-07 by jwbarlow@aol.com
In a message dated 1/7/2001 1:03:04 PM, jlarryh@... writes: >Right you are JB. I was describing the "electrical signal" wavelength >(like >a stupid stooge) Hey Larry, without setups like that, I'd be like the Maytag repair man around here! John (running to remove several miles of guitar cable from the back of my Deluxe) Barlow