The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:38 UTC

Message

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Second thoughts, an update

2008-01-08 by djacques@csulb.edu

Absolutely.  Just listen to the live recordings and you can really appreciate his work. Even when only playing two parts the orchestrations are beautiful.  
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: "Bernie" <kornowicz@cox.net>

Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:12:14 
To:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Second thoughts, an  update


I have to agree. While others used only 2 or 3 different sounds, 
 Pinder used pretty much all that were available to him.
 
 Bernie
 
 --- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "tomdcour" <tomdcour@...> 
 wrote:
 >
 > Mike Pinder- In my opinion no one has ever put the Mellotron or 
 Chamberlin to better use, 
 > or used a wider variety of sounds and techniques. His 
 orchestrations made the music work 
 > (which is what orchestrations are supposed to do). The songs 
 are ,more or less, vehicles 
 > for his beautiful mellotron playing. That is what makes the Moody 
 Blues worthwhile and 
 > the only thing that makes them noteworthy in a blog like this. The 
 Moody's "minimal 
 > songs allowed him to use a really big canvas of mellotron sounds. 
 He didn't an intricate 
 > band like Yes or Genesis to try and weave his parts around. 
 Whether you can stomach the 
 > rest of the Moody Blues or not I've got to give contnual credit to 
 Pinder as a master.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > --- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "thinkingalouduk" 
 <owen@> wrote:
 > >
 > > --- In newmellotrongroup@ <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, "David Jacques" 
 <djacques@> wrote:
 > > > All I can say is that you had to be there, living and growing 
 up in the 60's
 > > > and 70's, to truly appreciate the Moody Blues' music.
 > > 
 > > Interesting - as I wasn't born until around the time Seventh 
 Sojourn (the last of the 7) 
 > was 
 > > released. My exposure to the MBs came in the early 1980s - my 
 musical diet at that 
 > point 
 > > was Adam And The Ants, Duran Duran, Depeche Mode and their ilk, 
 along with The 
 > Mamas 
 > > and the Papas and a few other pop bits and pieces from my 
 parents' era. Then along 
 > came 
 > > a Moodies compilation and I couldn't work out how they were 
 making those weird string 
 > > sounds _without_ a string section (I couldn't do it on my Casio, 
 and this was the 1980s).
 > > 
 > > I've never really listened to classic prog; to my perception, 
 the bits I _have_ heard 
 > usually 
 > > seem to meander on for too long without getting to the point. I 
 guess I like songs 
 > rather 
 > > than epics, and am not particularly bothered about the technical 
 abilities of the players 
 > - if 
 > > the sound that comes out at the end appeals to me, I don't care 
 whether the performer 
 > > can do six chromatic octaves in 10 seconds or whether it was 
 created by a flock of 
 > geese 
 > > pecking at landmines.
 > > 
 > > It's all just down to personal preference. I like the Moody 
 Blues, others don't. I can live 
 > > with that.
 > > 
 > > Owen
 > >
 >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.