The Mellotron Group

Mini Moogs and Voyagers sure are heavy, and it would be money well spent to offset the cantilever effect.
Another reason a real Mellotron is better than the digital gadget, in my opinion.
Tony
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bruce Daily 
  To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos


    
        ...And your Minimoog is just going to fall right off the back!

           (But they will probably supply a special support bracket, at a nominal fee, for just that purpose) 

          -Bruce D.

        --- On Wed, 7/13/11, lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:


          From: lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com>
          Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos
          To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
          Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 6:42 AM


            
          Well it isn't a real Mellotron any more than a Memotron is.


          In a message dated 7/13/2011 7:07:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, tron400@yahoo.com writes:
              


            "The machine is built by Markus Resch, who also build real Mellotrons since 1999 (Mark VI & VII)."

            That's a strange statement. It's like they're saying the M4000D isn't a real Mellotron.

            Bernie

            --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Charles" <charel196@...> wrote:
            >
            > http://balduin.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/mellotron-m4000d/
            >