The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:38 UTC

Message

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: New Moneypit story noticed

2012-12-28 by JAMES STRAUSS

I'm not a Facebook guy myself..nothing to do with anybody in particular, I just don't want people at work accessing information...as a matter of fact...I've seen some conflicts in the workplace as a result of social networking.
 
I can keep up with what's goiing on via the typical forums I go to regularly, and email.

--- On Fri, 12/28/12, Tony <atm655@verizon.net> wrote:


From: Tony <atm655@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: New Moneypit story noticed
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, December 28, 2012, 11:11 AM



  






Good to know that these people are still around and active at the very least.
Maybe Ken isn’t on FB, I know I’m not very keen on it.
 
Beautiful machine and restoration, as we come to expect from Jerry!
Thanks Bruce for sharing this with us!
 
Tony #510 and an overdue M4000 #28 or 29.


 

From: lsf5275@aol.com 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 9:32 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: New Moneypit story noticed
 
  


I tried to get Ken Leonard to accept me as a Facebook friend, but no-go. I suspect I am at least part of the problem, although I have no idea why. I get along well with Jerry and he has visited my home.
 
Frank
 

In a message dated 12/28/2012 8:45:56 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, tron400@yahoo.com writes:
  

I wish those guys would join this group. I've tried to talk Ken into it a couple of times, but no go.

Bernie

--- In mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com, Bruce Daily <pocotron@...> wrote:
>
> Hey kids!!
>  
>   I noticed that Ken Leonard has a new Moneypit story!
>  
>    http://www.kleonard.com/mellotron/vt1109/ 
>  
> Quite an interesting machine.  Jerry Korb is back at it!
>  
>  
>      -Bruce D.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.