OK, the ring modulator trick is a very clever one. If you feed a signal into the x channel of a ring mod, and a static voltage into the y, you get zero output. If you have a changing voltage going through the y, it passes audio. you can use a ring modulator to shape the volume of a sound using this trick - feed the audio through x, feed a variable DC voltage through y, and when you turn the pot controlling the level of the DC voltage, it kind of "bows" the sound, the qwhicker you turn the pot, the more quickly the sound level rises. Just turning a pot is tricky, though, it's too small to get fine control, attaching a knitting needle to the pot gives you a wider control arc (?) - easier to finely control the level and articulate it so it fits with the track. It's a very, very clever trick, Townshend's synth programming skills are much underrated. On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:57 PM, ceccles_ca <ecclesreinson@rogers.com> wrote: > OK you experts. The unusual string synth parts on Quadraphenia... > What is it? 1973 so it can't be Solina. Maybe a Freeman? > > The guys on the prosoundweb forum asked 'the man' himself. See page > 13 and 14 for PT's detailed reply: > > http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/pdf.php?th=18558&0/ > > Four tracks with 6 violin sounds each. Amazing. > I don't really understand what he did with the knitting needle. > >
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Quadraphenia string synths
2008-03-25 by Norman Fay
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.