Then you can get me. If you catch me. :) On 12/3/07, mellotronist <mellotronist@cox.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > My, my. The list is a week old and already you're talking about censorship > and moderating? If you don't need to go on the defensive, why are you? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: MAinPsych@aol.com > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:04 AM > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Top 10 Worst Keyboards > > > > In a message dated 12/3/2007 9:54:37 AM Eastern Standard Time, > mellotronist@cox.net writes: > After a little further reflection, it strikes me that perhaps the whole > topic of conversation would more correctly be thought of "beloved keyboards > vs. hated keyboards" rather than "good keyboards vs. bad keyboards." That > would clarify the subjective nature of the conversation and define it as > opinion rather than empiricism. It's Frank's fault. > > Read my previous posting. Permeable thinking would accept its simple > premise, as opposed to an anal retentive or OCD knee-jerk reaction. > > I don't need to go on the defensive here. If you have what you think is a > legitimate beef, write me off-list. and I'll be more than happy to discuss > it. I shouldn't need to point out that this is the type of thing that let > to mutiny from the old list. Clay, do you need to step in here? > > Cheers, > Frank 1 > > > > ________________________________ > Check out AOL Money & Finance's list of the hottest products and top money > wasters of 2007. > > >
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Top 10 Worst Keyboards
2007-12-03 by gino wong
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.