The Mellotron Group

You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages.  Some
messages get routed to a Yahoo spam folder.  For some unknown reason,
emails go there occasionally.  I have to approve or reject the stuff
in the spam folder.  That's the reason for the delay.  Posts from
Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.

Should I shut off the spam filter?  We haven't had any real spam.

Clay

In a message dated 1/28/2008 8:02:27 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
ecclesreinson@rogers.com writes:

That's  the reason for the delay. Posts from
Mattias and Martin often end up in the  spam folder.




And properly so...



**************Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape.     
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489

Not if it keeps Martin and Mattias out.

Mike (not spam)

ceccles_ca wrote:
>
> You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages. Some
> messages get routed to a Yahoo spam folder. For some unknown reason,
> emails go there occasionally. I have to approve or reject the stuff
> in the spam folder. That's the reason for the delay. Posts from
> Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.
>
> Should I shut off the spam filter? We haven't had any real spam.
>
> Clay
>
>  

-- 
Mike Dickson, Edinburgh

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, ceccles_ca wrote:

> You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages.  Some
> messages get routed to a Yahoo spam folder.  For some unknown reason,
> emails go there occasionally.  I have to approve or reject the stuff
> in the spam folder.  That's the reason for the delay.  Posts from
> Mattias and Martin often end up in the spam folder.


i wonder if this is happening due to links being in their 'sigs'?
[which would be a likely spam characteristic...]

there should be a way for you to 'whitelist' or approve them as
senders once and for all, but 'should' is the keyword...


> Should I shut off the spam filter?  We haven't had any real spam.


we will, i can assure you.
the 'group' is probably just too new to be noticed, but the clock ticks
on... and it will happen...


> Clay


...jeff

So it's a digital delay, then?


> 
>> You may have noticed a delay in the arrival of messages.