The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:38 UTC

Thread

Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Mike Dickson

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.

What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Gary Brumm

Mike,

You might want to check eBay under sold items to see if you can get an idea of what they are currently going for.
The asking price really means nothing...you have to see what they actually sell for.  The same goes for those "boutique"
gear dealers as they ask astronomical prices that do not reflect the real world value.  Also the age of the capacitors is
such that if it hasn't been rebuilt it will likely be undependable if even operable.  As far as service goes I used to work
on them and would be happy to give you any information I can but it might be a little far for a service call!  The last I
checked a Minimoog in good shape was running around $1800 USD but that was a while ago.  Actually in this economy
you might actually be able to get a better deal these days.

Gary
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Dickson
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 8:50 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs



Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.

What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Kinchmusic

If you decide against it Mike I might be interested, even if it needs work.

Andy

Andy Kinch
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 18 Nov 2012, at 04:50, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.
> 
> 
> What are they generally being sold for these days?
> What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> 
> Mike
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Chris Dale


Mike,

Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.


The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.

When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).

Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).

In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.

But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.

Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.

The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.

I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.

But it is something to be aware of.


You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.

There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.

The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.

Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.

It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.


Chris
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.


What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike


Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Paul Marshall

Hi Mike,
Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
I've had 2 issues since then
(1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all ;4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
(2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
cheers Paul M.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Dale
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs


Mike,

Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.


The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.

When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).

Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).

In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.

But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.

Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.

The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.

I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.

But it is something to be aware of.


You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.

There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.

The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.

Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.

It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.


Chris





On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.


What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)

Mike




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by ClayE

Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim)  There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty  Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...  The new ones sound FAB to me.  The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful.  A breeze to figure out.  

For an instant erection, check out the white ones!

Clay  


--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Mike, 
> 
> 
> Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
> 
> Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
> 
> I've had 2 issues since then
> (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> 
> (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
> 
> Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come. 
> 
> And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o  ?
> 
> cheers Paul M.
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Chris Dale 
>   To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
>   Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
>     
> 
>   Mike,
> 
>   Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
> 
> 
>   The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
> 
>   When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990)  people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
> 
>   Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
> 
>   In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> 
>   But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
> 
>   Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics. 
>   Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.)  What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
> 
>   The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine. 
> 
>   I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days. 
> 
>   But it is something to be aware of. 
> 
> 
>   You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
> 
>   There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> 
>   The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning. 
>   On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> 
>   Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics.  In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> 
>   It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> 
> 
>   Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> wrote:
> 
>       
>     Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.
> 
> 
> 
>     What are they generally being sold for these days?
>     What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> 
> 
> 
>     Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
>   __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> 
>   The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
>   http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Andy Kinch

And can be bought for half the price! 


Andy Kinch
kinchmusic@aol.com




-----Original Message-----
From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@rogers.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs


 

Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something... The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out. 

For an instant erection, check out the white ones!

Clay 

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Mike, 
> 
> 
> Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
> 
> Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
> 
> I've had 2 issues since then
> (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> 
> (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
> 
> Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come. 
> 
> And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
> 
> cheers Paul M.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Chris Dale 
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
> 
> 
> The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
> 
> When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
> 
> Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
> 
> In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> 
> But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
> 
> Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics. 
> Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
> 
> The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine. 
> 
> I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days. 
> 
> But it is something to be aware of. 
> 
> 
> You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
> 
> There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> 
> The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning. 
> On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> 
> Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> 
> It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> 
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> 
> 
> 
> What are they generally being sold for these days?
> What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> 
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by gino wong

Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
£ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according to quality. If well kept a lot more.

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@aol.com> wrote:

And can be bought for half the price!

Andy Kinch
kinchmusic@aol.com



-----Original Message-----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@rogers.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something... The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.

For an instant erection, check out the white ones!

Clay

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
>
> Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
>
> I've had 2 issues since then
>; (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
>
> (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
>
> Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come.
>
> And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o ?
>
> cheers Paul M.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Dale
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
>
>
> The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
>
> When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
>
> Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
>
> In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
>;
> But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
>
> Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics.
> Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
>
> The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine.
>
> I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
>
> But it is something to be aware of.
>
>
> You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
>
> There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
>
> The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning.
> On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
>
> Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
>
> It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
>
>
> Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about. Yes, we're quite a team.
>
>
>
> What are they generally being sold for these days?
> What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>




--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by ClayE

The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00.  All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels.  If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.  

Clay  


--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong <wonggster@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> £ 1250  is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> 
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@...> wrote:
> 
> > **
> >
> >
> > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> >
> > Andy Kinch
> > kinchmusic@...
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@...>
> > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >  Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> >
> > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > in the UK like yourself.
> > >
> > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > metal box).
> > >
> > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > >
> > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > >
> > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > should be around for some time to come.
> > >
> > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > :-o ?
> > >
> > > cheers Paul M.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Chris Dale
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > >
> > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > on some variables.
> > >
> > >
> > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > matters a lot to you.
> > >
> > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > believe).
> > >
> > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > name mini-moog).
> > >
> > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > >
> > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > (some say better) sound.
> > >
> > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > from the electronics.
> > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > electronics.
> > >
> > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > back when I got mine.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > >
> > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > >
> > >
> > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > new oscillator cards.
> > >
> > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > >
> > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > /pitch tuning.
> > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > >
> > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > >
> > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> >
> >     
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *
> *
> *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> BSComm, BSEE,
> ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> 
> *Ginowong@...*
> *
> *
>

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by markpringnz

I was a bit disappointed with the Slim Phatty, it is probably my ears but it didn't sound amazingly different to any other synthesizer and seemed pretty expensive for a monophonic synthesizer. I quite liked the DSI mopho keyboard which also has a great layout. In the end I decided to stick with my Microkorg and VSTs. The Arturia Moog sounds pretty good. One electromechanical nightmare is enough for me!

Mark

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "ClayE" <ecclesreinson@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim)  There are many good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one. http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty  Some people think the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...  The new ones sound FAB to me.  The interface is the same on all of the Phatty's and it's beautiful.  A breeze to figure out.  
> 
> For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> 
> Clay  
> 
> 
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike, 
> > 
> > 
> > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am in the UK like yourself.
> > 
> > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up metal box).
> > 
> > I've had 2 issues since then
> > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4 diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > 
> > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > 
> > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which should be around for some time to come. 
> > 
> > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape :-o  ?
> > 
> > cheers Paul M.
> > 
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: Chris Dale 
> >   To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
> >   Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> >   Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > 
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >   Mike,
> > 
> >   Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending on some variables.
> > 
> > 
> >   The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this matters a lot to you.
> > 
> >   When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990)  people were paying more for the ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I believe).
> > 
> >   Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the name mini-moog).
> > 
> >   In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > 
> >   But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and (some say better) sound.
> > 
> >   Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off from the electronics. 
> >   Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it to make it look more contemporary.)  What they really did was just damage everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the electronics.
> > 
> >   The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues back when I got mine. 
> > 
> >   I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days. 
> > 
> >   But it is something to be aware of. 
> > 
> > 
> >   You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or new oscillator cards.
> > 
> >   There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > 
> >   The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave /pitch tuning. 
> >   On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > 
> >   Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple parts and electronics.  In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > 
> >   It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > 
> > 
> >   Chris
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > 
> >       
> >     Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     What are they generally being sold for these days?
> >     What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> >   __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > 
> >   The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> >   http://www.eset.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by Andy Thompson

From: Mike Dickson 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:50 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs


 
Mike

If you go for it (I recommend, FWIW), I’ve got a good tech guy down south (Bedford). Our Mark Wallis is another Man Who Knows.

Andy T.


Someone local to me is selling a minimoog.  I admit I am tempted.  He doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary about.  Yes, we're quite a team. 

What are they generally being sold for these days?
What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)


Mike

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-18 by John Hammaren

In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don\u2019t match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn\u2019t own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn\u2019t kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.

John

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.

Clay

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong <wonggster@...> wrote:
>
> Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> to quality. If well kept a lot more.
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> >
> > Andy Kinch
> > kinchmusic@...
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@...>;
> > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> >
> > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > in the UK like yourself.
> > >
> > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
>; > metal box).
> > >
> > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > >
> > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > >
> > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > should be around for some time to come.
> > >
> > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > :-o ?
> > >
> > > cheers Paul M.
> > >;
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Chris Dale
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > >
> > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > on some variables.
> > >
> > >
> > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > matters a lot to you.
> > >
> > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > believe).
> > >
> > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > name mini-moog).
> > >
> > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > >
> > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > (some say better) sound.
> > >
> > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > from the electronics.
> > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > electronics.
> > >
> > >; The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > back when I got mine.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > >
> > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > >;
> > >
> > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > new oscillator cards.
> > >
> > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > >
> > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > /pitch tuning.
> > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > >
> > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > >
> > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>; > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> > >;
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
>; >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *
> *
> *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> BSComm, BSEE,
> ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
>
> *Ginowong@...*
> *
> *
>

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-19 by tron400

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie 

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
> 
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
> 
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> 
> Clay
> 
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-19 by Mark Wallis


Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong > wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch > wrote:
> >
> > > **
>; > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
>; > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
>; > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
>; > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > >; electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > >; back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> >; > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >; __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
> >
>


RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Hi Bernie,

Yup, more than a few Q150s. It\u2019s good, not just not that good. I\u2019ve never heard Roger Arrick proclaim otherwise. The MOTM oscillator, MOTM-300 \u2013 now that\u2019s an oscillator. I repaired one for a friend and had to admit, it did sound better than the Q-150. Fatter, but still not in the Voyager class. Build quality is lacking compared to the Q-150, and therefore will probably never be under my Christmas tree for the price.

Of course, I don\u2019t proclaim myself to hold a candle compared to some other Dotcommies, and thus is my point about the 5%. It\u2019s like reading a discussion about Arturia\u2019s MinimoogV. I don\u2019t have time to take out the scope, but some do and you get the whole magilla in a detail beyond my needs, with phasing nuances and all that. Our ears are each unique and what sounds great to me may sound like crap to others. I\u2019ve heard stories that some people with perfect pitch cannot listen to well-tempered music \u2013 it is perceived to be so out of tune. Fascinating, and sad for them. Thanks for the tip \u2013 I\u2019ll check it out. Come to think of it, I wonder how the Tron would sound to that perfect-pitched individual? (I had to the Tron in to stay on topic.) J

Regards, John

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong > wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch > wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE >
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> >; > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >;
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> >; > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > >; think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > >; should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
>; > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
>; > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
>; > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > >; even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>; > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > >; >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >;
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>; >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
> >
>

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Bernie,

Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it\u2019s just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking R11; it was just my bad read of your note.

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong > wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch > wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE >
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
>; > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
>; > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >; > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> >; > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > >; matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> >; > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>; > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> >; > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >;
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by gino wong

If I may add to the discussion

For me a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong

Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don';t already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> >; > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>; > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty9;s and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
>; > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > >; >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >; > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
>; > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90';s hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> >; > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> >; > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >; > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson ; wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>; >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
> >
>





--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by Mark Wallis


Same here. It doesn't do everything but what it does do is beautiful..

To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: wonggster@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:38:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs


If I may add to the discussion

For me a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE ecclesreinson@>>;
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> >; > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > >; >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
>; > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
>; > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > >; Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
>; > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>; > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
>; > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
> >
>






--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics





Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by gino wong

I was going to run down this whole long list of Moog stuff I got recently for the same money but if somebody had dangled a life list item in front of me, discussion would have ensued.

Aside from the Minimoog do you have any other items on your bucket list Mike ?

Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:


Same here. It doesn't do everything but what it does do is beautiful..

To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: wonggster@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:38:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs


If I may add to the discussion

For me a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I9;ve found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren wrote:
>
>; In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >;
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
>; > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident9; connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn9;t be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > >; Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >;
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >; --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
> >
>






--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics








--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by lsf5275@aol.com

If you get one, after you die, can I have it?
 
Frank  (just wondering)
 
 
In a message dated 11/19/2012 7:39:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
wonggster@gmail.com writes:

 
 
 
If I may add to the discussion  


For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just  like the 
Mellotron underneath it.


gino wong



On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis 
<_markstuartwallis@hotmail.com_ (mailto:markstuartwallis@hotmail.com) > wrote:


 
 
 

Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand  off even if it's not working 
perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable  and it doesn't have to cost a 
fortune. They're only going to get more  expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best  Whooshes,

MSWx


 
____________________________________
To: _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: _tron400@yahoo.com_ (mailto:tron400@yahoo.com) 
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000   
 

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic:  minimoogs


 
John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a  Minimoog to 
compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of  imitating the Moog 
filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd  party filters that some 
people claim do an even better job than the  Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the  range selector 
half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an  octave lower than 
the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie  

--- In _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) , John Hammaren  <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point  is correct (about those keys being 
overpriced) for 95% of the user  population. And the same thing can be said for 
everything from automobiles  to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and 
have no interest, since I  have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount 
to patching on my Dotcom  will ever produce the fat sound one can get from 
the Voyager. Close, but not  the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados 
will argue the Voyagers don't  match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't 
own a Mellotron, I would  probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite 
happy, but I wouldn't kid  myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last 
point about the Moog is  build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It 
weighs quite a bit, and  has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo 
Review, I ask, would you  pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly 
somebody does. (Not I). Happy  Thanksgiving.
> John
> 
> From: _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com)  [mailto:_newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) ] On Behalf Of  ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) 
> Subject:  [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
>  
> 
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog  Voyager Old 
School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little  Phatty slim is 
$849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod  and pitch wheels. 
If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the  Little Phatty 
stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>  
> Clay
> 
> --- In _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) <mailto:_newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com) >, gino wong  <wonggster@<mailto:_wonggster@_ 
(mailto:wonggster@) >> wrote:
> >
> > Play  it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a  fair price if in good condition it goes up and down 
according
> >  to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov  18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch 
<kinchmusic@<mailto:_kinchmusic@_ (mailto:kinchmusic@) >> wrote:
> >
> > >  **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought  for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy  Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> >  >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:  ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:_ecclesreinson@_ 
(mailto:ecclesreinson@) >>
> > > To:  newmellotrongroup <_newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) 
<mailto:_newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com) >>
> >  > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject:  [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >  >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little  phatty (stage or slim) There are 
many
> > > good reasons to go  for a new one and only one reason to buy an old 
one.
> > > _http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty_ 
(http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty)  Some  people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more  gritty or more 
something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me.  The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's  beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For  an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
>  > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) <mailto:_newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com) >, "Paul Marshall"  <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >  > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
>  > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten  penn'orth 
as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> >  > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid  £1650. It's a 1974 model 
(date is
> > > on the test ticket which  on mine is glued onto the bottom of the 
pop-up
> > > metal  box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since  then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in  the bridge 
rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2  aged PSU capacitors which I should 
have
> > > replaced when I  bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > >  diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > >  >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the  multi pin plugs 
which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/  mod wheel assemblies. You could 
clean
> > > them but I just  replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors 
which I
> >  > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > >  >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the  plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are  built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some  time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look  nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold 
cape
> > >  :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
>  > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>  > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) <mailto:_newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com) >
> > >  > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject:  Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >  >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >  >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > >  > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog 
especially  in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now  ($3000) 
depending
> > > on some variables.
> > >  >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with  them is the oscillator tuning and whether 
this
> > > matters a  lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my  Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for 
the
> > >  ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 
10000  I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > >  Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence 
the
>  > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In  1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) 
changed  the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less  tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside  is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > >  oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter 
 and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > >  >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the  keyboard was ever 
sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
>  > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off  the 
keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what  they thought was 
hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more  contemporary.) What they really did was just 
damage
> > >  everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
>  > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old  vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big 
issues
> >  > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm  not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > >  >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> >  > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from  the back of the Minimoog whether you have the 
old or
> > > new  oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are  holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > >  Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to 
 do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more  haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch  tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all  nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are  fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from 
simple
> > >  parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be 
around  a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of  simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably  best to Google about all this and that way you can 
make an
> > >  informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
>  > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
>  > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >  > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >  > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@>  
wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
>  > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should  be 
wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > >  >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > >  What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy  
are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in  the UK - you 
cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief  round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >  >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > >  >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >  >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information  from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature  database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > >  > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >  >
> > > > _http://www.eset.com_ (http://www.eset.com/) 
>  > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >  > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of  virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117)  __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was  checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > >  > _http://www.eset.com_ (http://www.eset.com/) 
> > > >
> >  >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>  >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong  Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog  Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration,  Logistics*
> >
> >  *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > *
> > *
>  >
>





















-- 


Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm,  BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering,  Recording & Restoration, Logistics


_Ginowong@gmail.com_ (mailto:Ginowong@gmail.com)

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by tron400

John,

If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Bernie,
> 
> Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> 
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> 
> An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> 
> Bernie
> 
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > John
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > >
> > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > kinchmusic@
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > >
> > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > >
> > > > Clay
> > > >
> > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > metal box).
> > > > >
> > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > >
> > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > :-o ?
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > on some variables.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > believe).
> > > > >
> > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > >
> > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > electronics.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > >
> > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by gino wong

Yeah, I actually have a list. Don't want my stuff to go to those who can't use it or those who don't deserve it. EWhy burden your family with stuff they often consider , "his shit"



Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:

If you get one, after you die, can I have it?
Frank (just wondering)
In a message dated 11/19/2012 7:39:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wonggster@gmail.com writes:

If I may add to the discussion

For me a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall"
> > > wrote:
>; > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >;
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > >; in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident9; connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
>; > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
>; > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > >; matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >;
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> >; > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn9;t drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > >; > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > >; Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> >; > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
>; > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
>; > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
>; > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >; >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
> >
>





--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics







--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics




Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by Jay Shirley

You're right, Gino. I need to start working on my list, too. A different take on the 'bucket list'.

I've got a lot of cool gear.

RnR
js

On Nov 19, 2012, at 9:30 PM, gino wong wrote:

Yeah, I actually have a list. Don't want my stuff to go to those who can't use it or those who don't deserve it. EWhy burden your family with stuff they often consider , "his shit"





On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:

If you get one, after you die, can I have it?
Frank (just wondering)
In a message dated 11/19/2012 7:39:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, wonggster@gmail.com writes:

If I may add to the discussion

For me a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.

gino wong


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:


Mike-

If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
>
> Clay
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch kinchmusic@>> wrote:
>; >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
>; > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >;
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.comnewmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > >; > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > >; Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > >; On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> >; > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > >
> > >; >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*
> > *
> > *
>; >
>






--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics










--

Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics






RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked \u2013 (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s \u2013 they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, \u2018cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally agree with you \u2013 keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life \u2013 the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it \u2013 no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 \u2013 what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic \u2013 this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing \u2013 have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I\u2019ll bet it cranks.

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

John,

If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Bernie,
>
> Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>;
>
>
> John,
>
> Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
>
> An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren > wrote:
> >
> > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > John
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong > wrote:
> > >
> > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch > wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > >
> > > >; Andy Kinch
> > > > kinchmusic@
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ClayE >
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > >
> > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > >
> > > >; Clay
> > > >
> > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall"
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > metal box).
> > > > >
> > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > >
> > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > :-o ?
> > >; > >
> > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>; > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >; > > >
> > > > > Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > on some variables.
> > > > >
> > > >; >
> > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > believe).
> > > > >
> > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > >
> > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > electronics.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> >; > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > >; >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >;
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
>; > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > >
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> >; > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > >
> > > *Ginowong@*
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by Mike Dickson

On 20 November 2012 01:11, gino wong <wonggster@gmail.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text

I was going to run down this whole long list of Moog stuff I got recently for the same money but if somebody had dangled a life list item in front of me, discussion would have ensued.


Aside from the Minimoog do you have any other items on your bucket list Mike ?


I had to Google 'bucket list' to be sure what you meant. :-)

I don't really - at least nothing I'd say the innocent to get to. A decent Hammond might be okay, but I'm not in any great hurry for it. the minimoog just came up unexpectedly.

Mike

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by tron400

I would get lost in a 142 space modular. My modular knowledge pales in comparison to others on the Yahoo Dotcom forum. Wish I could grasp what they're talking about most of the time. If it was in musical terms instead of technical terms, I might have a chance.

My Dotcom was up to 88 spaces at one time and for me, it was unmanageable. It eventually went down to 22 spaces so I could give my stepdaughter some money for college, but has recently grown a little. I've had to go with some 3rd party modules just to fit the space I have. For instance, a STG Signal Amp is taking the place of 3 Q108's.

The Moog 500 series is really tempting, but I can't justify spending 3 or 4 times what it costs for any other brand. I'm sure they're really nice, but they are taking advantage of the Moog name to jack up the prices.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked - (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s - they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, 'cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally  agree with you - keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life - the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it - no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 - what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic - this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing - have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I'll bet it cranks.
> 
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.
> 
> Bernie
> 
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > Bernie,
> >
> > Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> >
> > An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> >
> > Bernie
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > John
> > >
> > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > > >
> > > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > > kinchmusic@
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > > >
> > > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > > >
> > > > > Clay
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > > metal box).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > > :-o ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > > on some variables.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > > believe).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > > electronics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > > >
> > > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by fdoddy@aol.com

Yes you do Gino!  For me, the thing about the Mini is not the low end, but the detail and energy in the low  mids.  I love building similar patches on a Mini and either another analog or modeled synth and demonstarting this to my music friends who think the Mini is all about the low end.  There are synths that are certainly stronger  at the bottom, my Phil Cirocco hot-rodded 2600 for one, but there's something about that low mid snarl that makes it....for me.


and yes, it does look pretty on top of my Streetly tron. It does have some scratchy pots and a selector switch that should be replaced, but other than that, it has been playing great for me for at least 12 years now.  I use a MIDI -CV converter as the keyboard is worthless.


fritz
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: gino wong <wonggster@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs


  
    
                  

If I may add to the discussion  


For me  a Minimoog is something I need to own before I die, just like the Mellotron underneath it.


gino wong




On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mark Wallis <markstuartwallis@hotmail.com> wrote:

 
  
    
                  


Mike-

  If it's affordable, bite the guy's hand off even if it's not working perfectly. Old Minimoogs are eminently fixable and it doesn't have to cost a fortune. They're only going to get more expensive.

Andy T-

Thank you sir! :-)

Best Whooshes,

MSWx



To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
From: tron400@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:33:29 +0000

Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

 
  
    
                  John,

Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.

An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.

Bernie 

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> John
> 
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
> 
> The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> 
> Clay
> 
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> >
> > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > >
> > > Andy Kinch
> > > kinchmusic@
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > >
> > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > metal box).
> > > >
> > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > >
> > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > >
> > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > >
> > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > :-o ?
> > > >
> > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > on some variables.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > matters a lot to you.
> > > >
> > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > believe).
> > > >
> > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > name mini-moog).
> > > >
> > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > >
> > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > (some say better) sound.
> > > >
> > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > from the electronics.
> > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > electronics.
> > > >
> > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > back when I got mine.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > >
> > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > new oscillator cards.
> > > >
> > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > >
> > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > >
> > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > >
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *
> > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > BSComm, BSEE,
> > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> >
> > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>;
> > *
> > *
> >
>


    
             
  
 		 	   		  



    
             

  






-- 



Gino Wong Birgelo
BSComm, BSEE,
ReRED Recording, Analog Sound Design
Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics



Ginowong@gmail.com

RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-20 by John Hammaren

Bernie ,

And so do I get lost. Never enough cables. As I said, addiction, although it was something I\u2019ve thought about since I was a young\u2019un and first listened to Carlos. And I must say for me it defies the old adage \u2018wanting is better than having\u2019. I know it sounds perhaps trite, but I can stare at the thing with the sequencers rolling for hours. Still satisfying even after 7 years of owning the original 66. BTW, Will does good stuff from STG, and I have a few things, including the Mankato. I know he appears to be a PITA to some in the Dotcom world \u2013 another reason to like him. In lieu of the 500 series, the Fooger Lowpass might be interesting and low cost enough to consider breaking out the soldering iron.

John

From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:25 AM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

I would get lost in a 142 space modular. My modular knowledge pales in comparison to others on the Yahoo Dotcom forum. Wish I could grasp what they're talking about most of the time. If it was in musical terms instead of technical terms, I might have a chance.

My Dotcom was up to 88 spaces at one time and for me, it was unmanageable. It eventually went down to 22 spaces so I could give my stepdaughter some money for college, but has recently grown a little. I've had to go with some 3rd party modules just to fit the space I have. For instance, a STG Signal Amp is taking the place of 3 Q108's.

The Moog 500 series is really tempting, but I can't justify spending 3 or 4 times what it costs for any other brand. I'm sure they're really nice, but they are taking advantage of the Moog name to jack up the prices.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
>
> Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked - (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s - they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, 'cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally agree with you - keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life - the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it - no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 - what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic - this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing - have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I'll bet it cranks.
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
>
>
>
> John,
>
> If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren > wrote:
> >
> > Bernie,
> >
> > Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com;
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> >
> > An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> >
> > Bernie
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren ;> wrote:
> > >
> > > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > John
> > >
> > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com; [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> > >
> > > Clay
> > >
> >; > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, gino wong > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch > wrote:
> > >; >
> > > > > **
> > > > >
>; > > > >
> > > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > > >
> > >; > > Andy Kinch
> > > > > kinchmusic@
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: ClayE >
> > > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > > >
> > > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > > >
> > > > > Clay
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Marshall"
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > > metal box).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > >; > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >; Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
>; > > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > > :-o ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > > >;
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > >;
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > > on some variables.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > > believe).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> >; > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > > electronics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > >; > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >; > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >; > > >
> > > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > >; > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > > >
> > > > *Ginowong@* > > > > *
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs

2012-11-21 by tron400

John,

I've started making some of my own cables in odd lengths because sometimes a two footer is too long or too short, so now I have some 1.5 footers (white heat-shrink) and some 2.5 footers (black heat-shrink).

At one time, I had a Q960 (with helper modules), a Q119 and the STG Time Modules (which I really miss). Now I only have a Q960 with 2 Q962's and 2 Q963's. If Will ever finishes the new Time Modules, I may replace my Q960; less space and more functionality.

I'm not much for DIY, but if someone could put a Fooger behind a Dotcom panel, I would definitely be interested :-)

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, John Hammaren <hammaren@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Bernie ,
> And so do I get lost. Never enough cables. As I said, addiction, although it was something I've thought about since I was a young'un and first listened to Carlos. And I must say for me it defies the old adage 'wanting is better than having'. I know it sounds perhaps trite, but I can stare at the thing with the sequencers rolling for hours. Still satisfying even after 7 years of owning the original 66. BTW, Will does good stuff from STG, and I have a few things, including the Mankato. I know he appears to be a PITA to some in the Dotcom world - another reason to like him. In lieu of the 500 series, the Fooger Lowpass might be interesting and low cost enough to consider breaking out the soldering iron.
> John
> 
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tron400
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:25 AM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> 
> 
> 
> I would get lost in a 142 space modular. My modular knowledge pales in comparison to others on the Yahoo Dotcom forum. Wish I could grasp what they're talking about most of the time. If it was in musical terms instead of technical terms, I might have a chance.
> 
> My Dotcom was up to 88 spaces at one time and for me, it was unmanageable. It eventually went down to 22 spaces so I could give my stepdaughter some money for college, but has recently grown a little. I've had to go with some 3rd party modules just to fit the space I have. For instance, a STG Signal Amp is taking the place of 3 Q108's.
> 
> The Moog 500 series is really tempting, but I can't justify spending 3 or 4 times what it costs for any other brand. I'm sure they're really nice, but they are taking advantage of the Moog name to jack up the prices.
> 
> Bernie
> 
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I think my Dotcom dyslexia is fixed following my re-read of my previous posts. A senior moment indeed for anyone who actually read and understood the backwards references to Q-dom. In any case (I went and looked - (3) Q-150s, (5)Q107s - they started cropping up used a few years back and I got this idea for a formant filter. A 142 space example of Dotcom addiction that abated finally a few years ago. I actually like the Q107 on its own. The MOTM modules will work quite nicely in the Dotcom with a little gizmo SynthTech sells (actually Bridechamber now sells their stuff now). Nothing more than a regulator on a postage stamp board. Easy peezy, 'cept for the module widths messing up the screw holes. I totally agree with you - keep the Dotcom. To be totally candid, my Voyager has been back to the factory twice in its 7 year life - the only two times it has left my house. Not exactly an endorsement of reliability. The Dotcom? A bad keyboard (a dead key). As us Dotcommers all know from others who have had any problems, Roger took care of it - no questions asked. He is one of a kind. I do like the Box-11 - what a great idea. Sorry for off-topic in case some grow bored with this. Hmm, back on topic - this has given me thought to plugging the Tron through the Q150 and EG. Hmm, one last thing - have you seen the 500-series Moog filter announced not long ago? Outrageous price, but I'll bet it cranks.
> >
> > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:12 PM
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > If you have more than a few Q150's, your system must be pretty large. I have one Q150, a Q107 and a couple of third party filters in a 55 space system (2 portable cabinets and a Box-11 frame). I've considered replacing the Q107 with another Q150 because I really like the sound, but the Q107 is a different animal. The MOTM needs a different power supply, doesn't it? Since I have no intention of expanding my system, I don't think I want to go that route. I had considered trading the whole thing in on a Voyager, but I like the patching freedom I have.
> >
> > Bernie
> >
> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bernie,
> > >
> > > Forgive my seeming confusion. I have no idea how that tangent started. The result of just getting over the flu. In any case, the Q106 is a fine filter, it's just not a Moog, IMHO. I do feel the oscillator Q-150 vs Moog or MOTM does its own part in the fatness equation, since I did run the MOTM through a 106 as well as the Q150 and the MOTM won that contest. So, anyway, in case you wondered what I was smoking - it was just my bad read of your note.
> > >
> > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of tron400
> > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:33 AM
> > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > Do you have a Q150 filter in your Dotcom? I don't have a Minimoog to compare it to, but my Q150 does a pretty convincing job of imitating the Moog filters I've heard on recordings. There are also 3rd party filters that some people claim do an even better job than the Q150.
> > >
> > > An interesting trick I've found with the Q106 is to put the range selector half-way between the Low and the 32' markings to drop an octave lower than the oscillator is normally capable of.
> > >
> > > Bernie
> > >
> > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, John Hammaren <hammaren@<mailto:hammaren@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In a general sense, your point is correct (about those keys being overpriced) for 95% of the user population. And the same thing can be said for everything from automobiles to Mellotrons. I have not played the Phatty and have no interest, since I have a Voyager Signature. I do know that no amount to patching on my Dotcom will ever produce the fat sound one can get from the Voyager. Close, but not the same. And Minimoog (classic) aficionados will argue the Voyagers don't match a finely maintained Minimoog. If I didn't own a Mellotron, I would probably buy a 4000D from Markus and be quite happy, but I wouldn't kid myself that this would ever be a real Tron. The last point about the Moog is build quality. Pretty damn good in my opinion. It weighs quite a bit, and has a real steel enclosure. If anyone reads Stereo Review, I ask, would you pay $240,000 for two mono-block amps? Clearly somebody does. (Not I). Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of ClayE
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 4:25 PM
> > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Minimoog Voyager Performer Edition and the Minimoog Voyager Old School both seem over priced to me, considering the Little Phatty slim is $849.00. All you need is a controller keyboard with good mod and pitch wheels. If you don't already have a good controller keyboard, the Little Phatty stage edition makes sense - Good value there too.
> > > >
> > > > Clay
> > > >
> > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, gino wong <wonggster@<mailto:wonggster@>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Play it, some sound like test equipment, no funk at all.
> > > > > £ 1250 is a fair price if in good condition it goes up and down according
> > > > > to quality. If well kept a lot more.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Andy Kinch <kinchmusic@<mailto:kinchmusic@>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > **
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > **And can be bought for half the price! [image: ;-)]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andy Kinch
> > > > > > kinchmusic@
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: ClayE <ecclesreinson@<mailto:ecclesreinson@>>
> > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > > > > > Sent: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:48
> > > > > > Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Other options - Get a new little phatty (stage or slim) There are many
> > > > > > good reasons to go for a new one and only one reason to buy an old one.
> > > > > > http://www.moogmusic.com/products/phattys/slim-phatty Some people think
> > > > > > the old mini Moog sounds more analog or more gritty or more something...
> > > > > > The new ones sound FAB to me. The interface is the same on all of the
> > > > > > Phatty's and it's beautiful. A breeze to figure out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For an instant erection, check out the white ones!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Clay
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, "Paul Marshall" <paulm@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agree with all the comments made so far, I add my ten penn'orth as I am
> > > > > > in the UK like yourself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bought mine in 2006 off eBay and paid £1650. It's a 1974 model (date is
> > > > > > on the test ticket which on mine is glued onto the bottom of the pop-up
> > > > > > metal box).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've had 2 issues since then
> > > > > > > (1) power supply failure (diode burned out in the bridge rectifier) - I
> > > > > > think this was caused by the 2 aged PSU capacitors which I should have
> > > > > > replaced when I bought it really. Swapped them out and replaced all 4
> > > > > > diodes in the bridge, £3 for the bits from maplin :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (2) wacky tuning - just oxidised contacts in the multi pin plugs which
> > > > > > connect the keyboard and the pitch/ mod wheel assemblies. You could clean
> > > > > > them but I just replaced them with gold plated 'Trident' connectors which I
> > > > > > am used to using professionally - sorted.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Overall I wouldn't be too scared to take the plunge as they sound
> > > > > > f***ing amazing and as Chris says are built from standard parts which
> > > > > > should be around for some time to come.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And they look nice sat on top of a Mellotron. Now where's my gold cape
> > > > > > :-o ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cheers Paul M.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: Chris Dale
> > > > > > > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:22 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Somewhat Off-Topic: minimoogs
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gary is 100% right about the $2000.00 price for a Minimoog especially in
> > > > > > this economy. Sometimes they might be a little more now ($3000) depending
> > > > > > on some variables.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The biggest issue with them is the oscillator tuning and whether this
> > > > > > matters a lot to you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I got my Minimoog (back in 1990) people were paying more for the
> > > > > > ones with the original oscillator cards (in serial numbers below 10000 I
> > > > > > believe).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Those were supposed to sound just like the modular Moogs, (hence the
> > > > > > name mini-moog).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In 1976 Norlin music (which took over Robert Moog's company) changed the
> > > > > > oscillator boards and made them more stable - less tuning drift.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But the downside is that the sounds weren't as rich because the new
> > > > > > oscillators didn't drift slightly like the old ones, giving a fatter and
> > > > > > (some say better) sound.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Another more important issue is whether the keyboard was ever sawed off
> > > > > > from the electronics.
> > > > > > > Some 'late 80's/early 90's hipster-morons' used to saw off the keyboard
> > > > > > and rack mount the electronic portion (what they thought was hot-rodding it
> > > > > > to make it look more contemporary.) What they really did was just damage
> > > > > > everything by changing the way cool air could circulate under the
> > > > > > electronics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The old vs newer oscillator cards / rackmounted units were big issues
> > > > > > back when I got mine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not sure if it influences price / desirability these days.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But it is something to be aware of.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can tell from the back of the Minimoog whether you have the old or
> > > > > > new oscillator cards.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are holes directly behind the oscillators that you stick a
> > > > > > Phillips screwdriver in to tune them. It's fairly straightforward to do.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The old ones have a more haphazard hole arrangement for the octave
> > > > > > /pitch tuning.
> > > > > > > On the post-1976 ones are the holes all nicely lined up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Minimoogs are fairly easy to get fixed because they are made from simple
> > > > > > parts and electronics. In fact, the Minimoogs of the 70's will be around a
> > > > > > lot longer than many chip based 80's synths because of simpler parts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's probably best to Google about all this and that way you can make an
> > > > > > informed decision before agreeing to a price.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Chris
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Someone local to me is selling a minimoog. I admit I am tempted. He
> > > > > > doesn't have any idea for a price and I don't know what I should be wary
> > > > > > about. Yes, we're quite a team.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What are they generally being sold for these days?
> > > > > > > What do you look for in one? What are the usual defects? How easy are
> > > > > > they to get fixed these days? (Bear in mind I am in the UK - you cannot
> > > > > > even get a Hammond fixed without grief round here)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > > > > > signature database 7703 (20121117) __________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.eset.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *Gino Wong Birgelo*
> > > > > BSComm, BSEE,
> > > > > ReRED Recording, *Analog Sound Design*
> > > > > *Audio Mastering, Recording & Restoration, Logistics*
> > > > >
> > > > > *Ginowong@*<mailto:*Ginowong@*>
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.