Ah, indeed. Makes sense now. Thanks! --- In prophet2000@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swayne <me@p...> wrote: > toorglick wrote: > > >I read about this before I got my p2k and the manual and thought it > >was a weird choice for stereo output. I was hoping the manual would > >shed some light on *why* it was done that way but no luck. > > I the people at Wine Country, and they sent this explanation for the p2k's > strange stereo output: > > Thanks for your email.. what you report is normal for the Prophet 2000. This > unit is not a STEREO output.. it is a SPLIT output.. meaning voices are > assigned to the Left and 4 voices are assigned to the right.. a cyclical voice > assignement results in 4 voices sound in the left and 4 voices sounding > from the > right. There is logic to this design in that with Dynamic Allocation OFF, the > Prophet 2000 can assign the sound located in memory A to 4 voices out of one > output, while the sounds located in memory B assign 4 voices to the other > output.. This makes no sense if you have a piano disk with sounds in memory > A and > memory B all being a piano.. However, if you have a Strings & Brass disk.. > you can see that 4 voices of strings out the left and 4 voices of Brass out > the > right output could be beneficial in separating these 2 different types of > sounds each with 4 voices of polyphony.
Message
Re: Stereo sound question
2003-07-15 by toorglick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.