Sequential circuits samplers group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Sequential circuits samplers

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:40 UTC

Thread

Re: [prophet2000] p3k WCP 1.6A

Re: [prophet2000] p3k WCP 1.6A

2003-03-14 by Olivier HUG

i don't have it
but why not try the 3.0B version wich is supposed to support SCSI too ?
http://www.inetix.fr/sites_heberg/prophet3000/

would anybody knows if WCP 1.6A is more stable ?


----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "sad_pierrot" <sad_pierrot@...>
To: <prophet2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:18 AM
Subject: [prophet2000] p3k WCP 1.6A


> hey all,  i'm wondering if anyone would be willing to send me an
> image file of this OS (WCP 1.6A), i know that might sound shady, but
> i'd like to test it first to see if i can actually access my scsi
> drive with this os version before i go ahead and spend the $28 for
> it.  thanks!
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> prophet2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: p3k WCP 1.6A

2003-03-14 by sad_pierrot

well actually that's what i was using, and for some reason i could 
not get the prophet to fully recognize the scsi drive.  it seemed 
like it was accessing it whenever i'd load the OS from floppy (it'd 
start to spin up the scsi simultaneously), but then i could never 
select anything but 'floppy' from the disk device menu.  i wanted to 
see if 1.6 would recognize the drive or not--however it doesn't 
matter much at this point as the scsi drive somehow mysteriously died 
on me yesterday, so i'll need to wait until i get a different one to 
try it again anyway.  would still appreciate if anyone has wcp 1.6 
and doesn't mind letting me 'borrow' it for this case.


--- In prophet2000@yahoogroups.com, "Olivier HUG" <olivier.hug@f...> 
wrote:
> i don't have it
> but why not try the 3.0B version wich is supposed to support SCSI 
too ?
> http://www.inetix.fr/sites_heberg/prophet3000/
> 
> would anybody knows if WCP 1.6A is more stable ?
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sad_pierrot" <sad_pierrot@y...>
> To: <prophet2000@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:18 AM
> Subject: [prophet2000] p3k WCP 1.6A
> 
> 
> > hey all,  i'm wondering if anyone would be willing to send me an
> > image file of this OS (WCP 1.6A), i know that might sound shady, 
but
> > i'd like to test it first to see if i can actually access my scsi
> > drive with this os version before i go ahead and spend the $28 for
> > it.  thanks!
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > prophet2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >

Re: p3k WCP 1.6A

2003-03-21 by sad_pierrot

> would anybody knows if WCP 1.6A is more stable ?

i've uploaded 1.6 B as an image file if you'd like to try it out for 
yourself (assuming your p3k is a revision B).  it doesn't seem any 
different to me than 3.0 B.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.