On Tuesday 02 May 2006 04:14 pm, John Brewer wrote: > That is right up to a point. I don't change them just for the sake of it > but over the years I have had more Tantalum failures in PSUs than any other > type. If the power supply has been 'designed' with very little reserve in > capacity then there can be a fair bit of ripple on the supply rails. Tants > just don't like this, and while they will not fail immediately, they will > not outlive the more robust ally can type. Ok, that makes sense... > As for getting one in backwards, you would never believe so much smoke could > come from such a tiny bead. Or such a loud noise, on occasion. :-) > JohnB > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason@...> > To: <vintagesynthrepair@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 6:37 PM > Subject: Re: [vintagesynthrepair] arp omni problem > > > Might be. But OTOH I'm not about to second-guess the guy that designed > > the > > > thing in the first place. Yeah, tantalum caps have some issues, but as > > long as you go with the right value for them, and make darn sure that > > you don't put them in backwards, I see no reason to replace them > > wholesale > > with > > > aluminum electrolytics... > > > > Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by > > lies. --James > > > M Dakin > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters" - Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin
Message
Re: [vintagesynthrepair] arp omni problem
2006-05-03 by Roy J. Tellason
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.