On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:37, Peter Bye wrote: > Don't do it. Replace the components with the original type and values. > > Electrolytics have both a definite shelf and operational life. > Currently about 2000 hr.. for the new stuff. > > They go bad just sitting and do not have the tolerances necessary for > some circuits, particularly timing, clock, etc., etc. that you would > find all over the place in a synth. > > Most electrolytics are about a +/- 20% value -- generally close enough > for power supply sections, but not sensitive electronics. More like -20%/+80% in many instances. Most caps that I've checked with my capacitance checker read way higher than the marked values. Also, a lot of failures of tantalum caps are because of either getting too close to or exceeding the rated voltage. A prime example is in the ARP Omni, where they used 25V parts for a situation where as much as 30V might end up being present! Going a little bit higher in voltage won't hurt anything at all, and will probably give better longevity. Me, I wouldn't replace tantalum caps with electrolytics either. Look at the datasheet for your typical 3-terminal regulator parts, like the 7805 -- they'll specify a 1uF tantalum cap at the output, or a 25uF (!) aluminum electrolyitc... -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters" - Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin
Message
Re: [vintagesynthrepair] Re: Replacing tantalum caps with electrolytic caps
2007-06-20 by Roy J. Tellason
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.