> The mod I was reading about suggests > the 411 as a low noise replacement > for the 301. I admit my 2600 is a bit > noisy, most notably in the mixer and > reverb section. The LF411 isn't exactly a low noise opamp. Typical noise voltage is 25nV/SQRT(Hz). The LM301 has a typical noise voltage of ca. 15nV/SQRT(Hz), which actually makes it _better_ than the LF411. Both are not exactly low noise opamps. For comparison, a decent mic amplifier chip like the SSM2017 has less than 1nV/SQRT(Hz). Of course this will _not_ fit in here; just to show the difference. There are opamps with similarly low noise, whouch _would_ fit in, but don't ask me for part numbers. Now this is only part of the sory, though. If you have a high impedance circuit (large resistors in your circuit), BiFet Opmaps like the LF411 might be less noisy, because they have very low noise *current*. (This adds to the noise voltage, depending on the feedback resistors around your opamp.) So depending on the circuit, you might even get a little noise improovement with a 411 instead of a 301. BUT then I'd really suggest a low noise BiFet Amp like the TL071 (if you want an inexpensive replacement). This has a noise voltage similar to the LM301, but - like the LF411 - does not contribute much noise current. If you want to go a little further, try one of the plenty modern opamps offered from Analog Devices or TI (formerly Burr Brown) which have noise voltage in the range of a few nV/SQRT(Hz). Expect to pay a few dollars, though, and check if you like the sound. Replacing an opamp with a better one will not automatically lead to a better sound - it might, or it might not. You have to try it with your own ears. I'd try a cheap TL071 first. (needs no external compensation capacitor, so remove this if you swap the opamps.) JH.
Message
Re: LM301 vs. LF411a
2003-02-18 by dark_november2000 <jhaible@t-online.de>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.