> Are you using > your Buchla to play melodies with a keyboard? Yes, the touchplate style keyboard. >Are you multitracking > such melodies? Sometimes. Why not? > Please don't take this the wrong way, but why are you using an analog > for that kind of work? I don't see how that can be efficient. Me no understand? Why can't I use anything I want? I'm the composer and performer. It's not about efficiency, it's about creativity. I've been using computer sequencers and midi equipment for 14 years. I find it quite a boring process, thinking in terms of numbers and values (on the computer) and using other peoples sounds (midi modules and sample CD's). I eventually got into modulars and bought a Fenix, a Serge panel and started putting together a Modcan system. When I bought my small Buchla system I found it to be more intuitive than anything else I was using. For melodies, the patching is very straight forward. The 'keyboard' is completely open ended. For example, I can set the pitch controls to a scale of my own invention and just see what happens. I can set the pitch controls to the exact melody I want, working from the lowest touch plate to the top or vice versa. I can set the pitch row A to play a melody and set the pitch row B (controlling a second VCO) to play the exact same melody, except with the odd note as a harmony. Anyway, the open ended nature of the instrument is inspiring (even in the role you seem to doubt it can perform). I could go on, but why bore everyone? CW
Message
Re: [wiardgroup] Re: fartin' in the church
2004-06-25 by Chris Whitten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.