Having built a couple, I can say that if you're patient enough to roll your own, the #3 Wogglebug is definitely worth the effort. R. > -----Original Message----- > From: drmabuce [mailto:drmabuce@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 8:37 PM > To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [wiardgroup] Re: this is for grant i guess > > > > Hi Dustin > I've never disassembled my production wogglebugs for a > component by component comparison but I was in close contact > with Grant during the development of the circuit in the > summer of 2001. To my knowledge, there were six prototypes. > #5 was the production model ***. I've built several #3's > and modified them to my taste. > Schematics of my favorite mods are in the files section of this group > labelled: WBug3Mods-DrMabuce.jpg. > To address your question more directly. The core of the > wogglebug is the 4046-pair , the 398 sample-hold and the > vactrol.VC1 - the evolution of the woggle bug circuit after > #3 tended to be progressive refinements of the voltage > controlled clock (U5 & VC2) that triggered the 398 and the > circuit that controlled the LED portion of the vactrol, VC1. > In the #3 circuit VC1 and a second vactro.l, VC2 are > controlled, together, in series by a single CV. To my > (deranged) ear , the option of controlling VC1 and the > clock-rate VC2 separately yields a lot more interest . > Also I imagine that Grant would have been inclined to > improve the transistor-based circuit (Q1) that controlled > VC1--- probably with a op-amp CV buffer. > > I realize this response id far from definitive, but on the > whole I believe that Grant published the essence of the > wogglebug in the #3 schematic - an almost insanely generous act IMHO. > > melt some solder and try it! > -doc > > *** > the #6 schematic included an ill-fated implementation of the > MF-10 one-chip programmable filter that was too outrageously > noisy for a commercial design - I added one to my production > board just to find out! > `a bridge too far!' > > > > --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "ed.j.wise" <dustin.sedlacek@g...> > wrote: > > > > or anyone else that knows how is the wogglebug#3 schematic > that i have > > found diffrent from the production model wogglebug that is sold on > > the web site? > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > --------------------~--> Tired of hearing the same songs over > and over? > Listen to Internet Radio! Skip songs. Click to listen to LAUNCHcast! > http://us.click.yahoo.com/OXvbED/HARHAA/n1hLAA/QnLolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------~-> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [wiardgroup] Re: this is for grant i guess
2004-12-14 by Fahl, Romeo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.