hello mark, thanks for posting best wishes ingo --- Mark <mark@inspiringsounds.com> schrieb: > Sorry if this is getting boring for some of you though you all seem > to be taking this in good spirit. I've spent a happy(?) hour or so > going through the EU pages on this. It seems there are several > request for exemptions, these include for musical instruments with a > lifespan of over 10 years, and for professional audio equipment. The > EU has been asking about other technical solutions, cost > implications etc. Funny thing is that you get to see the letters > that have come into the EU. The musical instruments one actually > came from a digital church organ company. The audio exemption > request is from one company only it seems. You also see complaints > about people not replying, asking if they had a nice holiday, their > out of office assistants, even there "this is only for the > recipient" type legal statements. Such is the banality of superstate > legislation. It's not faceless eurocrats, its people not replying > because they've been having a nice time at the seaside. > > Anyway, reading the sorts of arguments people are making I think > actually there is a case, certainly in spirit. As Grant has > indicated there is something about volume, ie the amount of lead > involved, the number of units..there is also something about it > being "consumer". Looking through the list of things covered by RoHS; > > "1. Large household appliances > 2. Small household appliances > 3. IT and telecommunications equipment > 4. Consumer equipment > 5. Lighting equipment > 6. Electrical and electronic tools (with the exception of large- > scale stationary industrial tools) > 7. Toys, leisure and sports equipment > 8. Medical devices (with the exception of all implanted and infected > products) > 9. Monitoring and control instruments > 10.Automatic dispensers. > 11.Light bulbs, and luminaires in households" > > Now under "consumer equipment" musical instruments are mentioned. > This breaks down as > "Radio sets > Television sets > Video cameras > Video recorders > Hi-fi recorders > Audio amplifiers > Musical instruments > And other products or equipment for the purpose of recording or > reproducing sound or images, including signals or other technologies > for the distribution of sound and image than by telecommunications" > > But I would argue when you look at the company musical instruments > are in that this is disposable stuff. So professional studio > equipment looks like its not really on the list, either explicit or > implictly. If it is not on the list it is not exempt, but it is > outside of the scope of RoHS. > > regards, Mark > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > --------------------~--> > You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See > how. > http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/QnLolB/TM > --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > http://www.dron.de http://www.selfoscillate.de http://www.signalform.de ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
Message
RE: [wiardgroup] RoHS (again)
2006-05-29 by Ingo Zobel
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.