--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "drmabuce" <drmabuce@...> wrote: > > The problem with large-scale integration designs is that they > impose a choice between catering to the 'bug-music' (sic) > aficionados or the 1V/oct. fans (with their DVMs). While I agree that 'Please all please none' is a slippery slope, I believe where Grant's designs perhaps excel most is their ability to produce sounds that are incredibly useful musically, REGARDLESS OF HOW A PARTICULAR INDIVIDUAL DEFINES "MUSICAL." From Wogglebug'd glitch noise to Olivier's beautiful soundscapes to Gary's "Kingdom Hospital" work to Isotope 217's jazzy hip-hop, the Wiard seems to me the most genre agnostic electronic instrument ever invented. I have heard Grant say before that he'd like The Wierd to be usable as a child's toy as well as a professional's instrument! Whether Grant eventually decides to produce a "normalized" single panel synth or simply elects to provide a laptop case designed to house 1200-series modules, I am certain it will prove exceedingly useful for all musician-types. (That includes my 2-year old son, Ethan, whose budding talent on the Wiard joysticks has replaced my PSIM as primary source of low frequency oscillations to drive twin JAGs. How's that for MARF?) I have no concerns re: Grant's ability to engineer adequate flexibility into his design. The keys will be to conceive a user interface that makes it sufficiently easy for novice synthesists to create sounds that they find pleasing and to introduce said instrument into the public consciousness. Perhaps Grant could name it the "Wiard Easyl?" > what would -everybody- buy? Toilet paper (to steal from Gary's previous MARF suggestion) Just my penny or two's worth, Chris
Message
Re: I was thinking...
2007-01-20 by paradigmshiftbeats
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.