Hi Mike ... a quibble to keep the record straight, based on your post, i suspect that, like me, you have a REV 1 noise ring. As I understand it, all new customers would get the REV 2 , which bears on one of your points... to wit: --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, mmcgrath@... wrote: > Also of course when you need a burst of noise to add to the > attack of a percussion sound, the Blacet unit has the edge. the REV 2 noise ring has a full-spectrum analog white noise output jack (not implemented on mine)which could be used for percussive bursts but to keep the game, on the level, your comment: --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, mmcgrath@... wrote: > Additionally, the Blacet is a better module if you are > looking to synthesize the sound of wind, surf, rain, waves, blizzards, > hurricanes., etc. In fact I'd like to say that this module is absolutely > AMAZING for work like this, and the ability to control every parameter > with CVs allows for some shifting, morphing changes to your weather > patterns! > ..is quite accurate John Blacet implemented a switchable multimode filter on the noise output of the Improbablility Drive and this can do double-duty, varying the character of available CV's steps and , as Mike points out, providing CV controlled filtered audio noise. The noise ring does not feature onboard audio filtering (thanx for your comments, Mike) -doc
Message
Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive
2007-01-31 by drmabuce
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.