Hi Matthew --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "mritenburg" <mritenburg@...> wrote:> > I see no compelling reason why a person should not be able to > request aluminum face plates if they are willing to incur the cost. i can envision a compelling reason. Though at this early stage i concede that it is all speculation. But if i understand Grant's original hypothesis, one scenario under consideration combines the circuit board and the panel. The components would occupy one side and the controls and jacks would protrude through the other side. This would obviously impart a lot of material and assembly savings. But some very innovative and unconventional engineering would be required to make it work (this time***) If that method was implemented there would be no discrete faceplate that could be customized. Even if there were a partial implementation of such a scheme, i.e. some components on a fiberglass 'faceplate' and some on a separate PCB, Metal faceplates would be precluded. i'm curious to find out of if this is indeed what Prof. Richter was considering. -doc *** anybody remember the Alesis 1622 debacle? ruin a fader...discard the mixer!
Message
Re: 300 series back in full production
2007-03-16 by drmabuce
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.