walkabout oscillator will be a huge hit here in Australia :-) Grant Richter wrote: > > > i totally agree with that. i did not understand from the > > envelooper announcement that feedback about the module is desired. > > in the past there was no discussion like that, the modules just > > showed up as is, without public discussions about the features, > > and that was it. or did i miss something? (very possible) > > > > I apologize for any confusion my remark has caused. > > I have spent hundreds of man hours over the last 3 years researching > new synthesizer technology in advanced controllers and advanced > multidimensional waveshaper and wave terrain oscillators. > > Like the other Wiard modules, these ideas are new and unique. > Because they are so new, the exact method of implementing > them is not entirely clear to me yet. But I have far too much invested > already to simply abandon the ideas. > > When I mentioned the Envelooper, I was hoping someone would come > forward in the manner of "I think this would work for this application > that I have in mind." People (and myself) still need more time to mull > over the application for such advanced devices. > > In regards to a fully integrated synthesizer; Many of the great synth > companies historically began with modulars, and then released fully > integrated instruments. ARP began with the 2500 series and later produced > the Oddysey. Moog began with the 900 series and later produced the > Mini-Moog. Emu began with a modular and later produced integrated > instruments. > > Of course, the integrated instruments never have the full capability > of the parent modular. There are always design trade offs. While I > would like to > produce an integrated instrument sometime in the future, it will not > be a replacement for the 300 or 1200 series, but will contain a scaled > down version of those unique technologies. First I have to finish > developing > those technologies, before I can concern myself with how best to > package them. > > At his exact moment, my concern is with getting the existing designs so > I can produce them for the next 3 to 5 years. The Envelooper design > project has only been placed on the back burner until I can catch up > with stocking parts and building your orders. > > My use of the word "dropped" was unfortunate because it gave the > impression I had abandoned the project. I have not. The Envelooper module > and Walkabout Oscillator are still being researched. I have working > prototypes > of both designs, but they need to be improved for manufacture. I also > need to > reseach if ideas like downloadable wavetables are fesible. > > I apologize again for any confusion. > >
Message
Re: [wiardgroup] Clarification on new module designs
2007-04-07 by amnesia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.