If you use the Classic VCO in low mode as a clock source, then all the waveforms from the Classic VCO, Sequantizer and Envelators will be in phase and make musical sense. The timing of the pulse is taken from the sawtooth so only the back edge modulates with PWM, this makes sense musically. The random output from the Classic VCO updates on the raising edge of the pulse output, like a sample and hold module would. --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Mark Griffiths <mark@...> wrote: > > hi there, > > I've been looking at the patch sheet on the Wiard site. It shows the Classic VCO, next to the Sequantizer, which is next to Envelator, then comes the Waveform City, Filter and Mixolator. I was suprised to see the Sequantizer and Envelator between the two oscillators, does anyone know why? > > > Second question which might be redundant deping on the reply to the above. I have the Wiard rack frame which will take 6 modules. I have 7. I have 2 Osc, 1 Borg, 1 Sequantizer, 1 envelator and 1 mixolator configuration, plus I have a Wooglebug. I was thinking of leaving the Wogglebug as a "free module" partly because it feels complete in itself, partly because I'm also using it on the Blacet/Wiard/Banalogue Frac rack. But I guess you could give similar arguments about the Sequantizer. What would you do? > > > regards, Mark >
Message
Re: Two questions about module layout
2008-06-02 by Grant Richter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.