Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Message

Re: Two questions about module layout

2008-06-02 by Grant Richter

If you use the Classic VCO in low mode as a clock source, then all the waveforms from the 
Classic VCO, Sequantizer and Envelators will be in phase and make musical sense.

The timing of the pulse is taken from the sawtooth so only the back edge modulates with 
PWM, this makes sense musically. The random output from the Classic VCO updates on 
the raising edge of the pulse output, like a sample and hold module would.


--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Mark Griffiths <mark@...> wrote:
>
> hi there,
>  
> I've been looking at the patch sheet on the Wiard site. It shows the Classic VCO, next to 
the Sequantizer, which is next to Envelator, then comes the Waveform City, Filter and 
Mixolator. I was suprised to see the Sequantizer and Envelator between the two oscillators, 
does anyone know why?
>  
>  
> Second question which might be redundant deping on the reply to the above. I have the 
Wiard rack frame which will take 6 modules. I have 7. I have 2 Osc, 1 Borg, 1 Sequantizer, 
1 envelator and 1 mixolator configuration, plus I have a Wooglebug. I was thinking of 
leaving the Wogglebug as a "free module" partly because it feels complete in itself, partly 
because I'm also using it on the Blacet/Wiard/Banalogue Frac  rack. But I guess you could 
give similar arguments about the Sequantizer. What would you do?
>  
>  
> regards, Mark
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.