>From: "wiard300" <wiard300@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com
>To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [wiardgroup] Is it possible to expand miniwave banks to 64 waves
>ala PPG?
>Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:54:11 -0000
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.40
>X-Sender: wiard300@yahoo.com
>Received: from n24.bulk.scd.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.53]) by
>mc7-f37.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 24 Apr 2005
>16:57:39 -0700
>Received: from [66.218.69.4] by n24.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Apr
>2005 23:54:15 -0000
>Received: from [66.218.66.31] by mailer4.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24
>Apr 2005 23:54:15 -0000
>Received: (qmail 65755 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2005 23:54:12 -0000
>Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP;
>24 Apr 2005 23:54:12 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO n6a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (66.94.237.40) by
>mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2005 23:54:12 -0000
>Received: from [66.218.69.4] by n6.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Apr
>2005 23:54:12 -0000
>Received: from [66.218.66.86] by mailer4.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24
>Apr 2005 23:54:12 -0000
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jE9O4+8RwMouGASfLqsXkjCSERkrupp7N0=
>DomainKey-Signature: X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email
>X-Apparently-To: wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com
>User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
>X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
>X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:7:0
>X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 69.149.197.238
>X-Yahoo-Profile: wiard300
>Mailing-List: list wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com; contact
>wiardgroup-owner@yahoogroups.com
>Delivered-To: mailing list wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com
>List-Id: <wiardgroup.yahoogroups.com>
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wiardgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
>Return-Path:
>sentto-3726533-1722-1114386854-wiardmodular=hotmail.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2005 23:57:39.0508 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[657C9F40:01C54929]
>
>
>Hello All. I love the miniwave, but I think it could sound even better
>if the bank size was expanded. How hard would it be to do this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Rob Adams
>
>
>