I'm pretty sure I went into this a long time ago, but just for clarification, the entire signal path of the XL-7 after the resamplers is 24-bit. The samples are 16-bit. The filters are 24, the FX are 24. S/PDIF might be 20, might be 24, but you should *certainly* record 44.1/24 off the S/PDIF and only ever record off the analog mains if, for some reason, you like the hiss of analog or the non-linearities of the DACs. And, a quick reason for 16 bit samples and 24 bit signal path: one 16 bit sound = 16 bits two 16 bit sounds = 17 bits four 16 bit sounds = 18 bits eight 16 bit sounds = 19 bits ... 16=20, 32=21, 64=22, 128 16 bit sounds =23 bits! And that's not even counting filters (which can go past 24 and into distortion even on one sound!) and the effects section. -Aaron --- oneal.patrick@... wrote: > > Fwiw, very few people actually record at 24-bits, even today. The > audio usually ends up in the 18-22 bit range. It is still very > difficult to try to record anything at 24 bits without "clipping" the > audio. > > Yu should be able to get perfectly respectable and cd-quality > recording at 16 bit/44.1 plus you have the added benefit of much less > cpu load, smaller space etc. > > > You can do that, but remember you will gain nothing by recording at a > > higher resolution with the XL-7 digitally. You could try recording > the > analogue outputs at 24bit, it will sound differant, better or worse.. > > You might well have no choice, maybe you get the choice of 16 or 24. > Go for it, it should be fine > Check this page out > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: Digital recording
2006-02-17 by Aaron Eppolito
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.