Thanks Steve for replying. It made me also remember the filter order....jut when I increased the filter order of one of the voices last night....I need to verify I didn't loose any nearby notes. BTW, the 128 number I gave was the max. simple/advertised polyphony of the XX-7 (not the bpm I am using)..... I will re-review the old discussions to see how I can save some voices..... Bob Corona/Riverside, CA ----- Original Message ----- From: steve_the_composer To: xl7@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:24 AM Subject: [xl7] Re: Maybe a retorical question on polyphony utilization I've never seen such a feature. I imagine the overhead to track and display # of voices in use in realtime would cut into the box's performance. I assume you know ways to cut down on the number of voices being used (get rid of unneeded chorus, get rid of 12-pole filters, make use unused layers have 000:none as instruments, etc.). Others interested in this might search the archives for "MOP"--Maxed Out Polyphony. (I seem to remember some discussions.) BTW, I am wondering if the 128 BPM limit is a hardware or software [OS] issue. Anyone know? --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "bob_at_work_2000" <tttsystems@...> wrote: > > I know we can calculate the number of polyphony voices used by the > XX-X units but as I build up a complex piece with dynamically active > notes and long decay time, I am beginning to notice some note cut-offs > probably due to maxing the 128 (hard to see how when you first look at > it but I'm sure it adds up fast). > > Wish there was/does anyone know of a way to look at maybe some screen > or indication on the XX-X to see how close you are to maxing the > polyphony? > > Bob > Corona/Riverside, CA > Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: Maybe a retorical question on polyphony utilization
2006-03-10 by Bob S.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.