sweet. never even thought of that. --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "steve_the_composer" <smw-mail@...> wrote: > > Looks like an interesting module. I took a quick look at the sysex > docs. It looks like you should be able to send both small and large > dumps from the E-Mu. > > My experience is that small sysex commands can be sent on the fly. > The only time I sent large amounts of data, I sequenced the data > over time. (I used Cakewalk to sequence the banks of sysex data into > a *.mid file and e-loader to put it in my E-Mu.) > > Single banks (400 bytes for performance dump; 608 bytes for voice > dump; etc. [not including sysex header/eox]) should be no problem > for the E-Mu to send. > > Best wishes with the project. > > --Steve > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Zsolt Szabó <Zsolt.Szabo@> wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > yes, I want complete dumps to store in the patterns. > > I asked the FS1R because the biggest sysex chunks originate from > there, > > very-very much parameters... > > > > Preferably I would send single banks data but multi is also > > a must so larger chuncks are expected... > > > > I put up the FS1R documents on my ftp area. > > The file you want to consult is fs1re2.pdf an look at MIDI > implementation > > at the end. > > Now I'm in the process to completely remote the FS1R from my > BitStream > > MIDI controller so I use them frequently. > > > > ftp://pub:pub001@ > > > > > > Thanks, > > Zsolt >
Message
Re: XL7 and in-pattern sysex storage
2006-08-27 by malik
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.