> Re: [xl7] Re: Let's have some opinions!I got my A4000 on ebay for > $799 fully loaded with ram, 250 zip drive, and scsi hard drive. > Can't beat that!!! It's a great machine It doesn't seem (correct me if I'm wrong) that many people have arrived here as synthesists. My experience with E-mu gear includes total disinterest in the original Proteus units, regardless of the sound ROM's, because the ability to create new sounds was always pretty limited. The first E-mu unit I bought was the UltraProteus, and that was because it's a Morpheus synth with additional filter cubes; the ROM sample set didn't matter so much as the modulation architecture. (Until then I'd been doing most of my work on a couple of Korg Wavestation racks, and doing a lot of modulation programming - if you're interested, the CD tracks at http://www.mp3.com/cassiel/ are mostly combinations of Wavestation and UltraPro.) I bought an Audity 2000 shortly after reviewing one for Recording magazine - I was really impressed by the clock-based modulation architecture and arpeggiator integration, and the fact that the filters had more bite and presence compared to the Morpheus/UltraPro generation; but I detested the user interface, and didn't have the time to knock up an editor/librarian for it. I came at the XL-7 as an Audity 2000 with an accessible, fast access interface to the synthesis architecture. The onboard sequencer was, to some extent, a bonus, and I might even have gone for the unit without that. The sequencer's useful for working out ideas in a hurry, and I'm really glad to have it, but it's underpowered for real, heavy-duty interactive live sequencing. (For my last gig I had some stuff running out of the XL-7 as backing, but most of the sequencing was software-based algorithmic stuff.) What I'm basically saying is: if you're going to judge the XL-7/MP-7 against other beat-boxes, keep in mind that you're getting a tremendously powerful (and high-polyphony) synthesis architecture in the box; don't just judge the ROM sets, the factory presets, the (lack of) sampling, or the sequencer features. -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [xl7] Re: Let's have some opinions!
2002-07-19 by Nick Rothwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.