Here is a comment from a respected mc909 list member, talking about some of the apparent shortcomings of the mc909. If Sean and others are reading, then these comments can be useful for the upcoming o.s. HINT HINT > - There is a Song Mode and it will record mutes separately from the patterns. > They weren't sure about controller sweeps, but you can always use a long > pattern for this. > I wonder if this is what I at least am looking for. The MC505 song mode allowed mutes separate from patterns. But it was not a real-time recorder of patterns or mutes. You had a list of patterns and to each you could assign various starting conditions, including mutes. So you programmed it as opposed to playing it while recording, and the mute and other changes where quantized to occur on only pattern boundaries. useful but not what is needed from my point of view. What Roland needs is a song-long control track(s) that allow any controller change, including synth parameters, mutes, pattern-triggers, and yes even RPS's, to be recorded. It should be thought of as a "log" of what the performer did to the machine while song-mode was recording. In this way all the actions are captured so that they can be played back faithfully in the future, and possibly edited (though I would settle for just selective erase, overdub passes, and punch-in style editing). The lack of this feature annoys me! The need should be obvious. Quasimidi had this in the Ravolutiopn 309 for goodness sake four years ago! The SU700 does this for everything it can do, including effects changes. Even Emu has started to figure this out with the Command Stations (though its full implementation awaits their upcoming new release.
Message
comment re mc909 that emu should consider for 2.0 os
2002-10-09 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.