> I know I can nomralize. I know the digital signal is better and has
> headroom. But I also know that E-mu knows it's a "bug" in the xx-7.
>
> As I mi the S/PDIF with other signals (analog, VSTi, analog out of
> the XL etc.), I have to turn all other signals down, because of the
> weak signal of the E-mu... and that's not the way it should be.
>
> It's a nice explanation... but it's not everyone's reality.
>
>
>
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "vibesart" <edmann@p...> wrote:
> > This subject has been discussed quite a bit - and those who know
> > (Aaron et al) say the S/PDIF signal is 20 bits. A medium-level 20-
> bit
> > signal is much better than a medium-level 16 bit signal, meaning
> that
> > within the S/PDIF signal as it exists right now there is most likely
> > 13-16 bits of actual data, which is consistant with (and above many)
> > CD's. (this is my guesstimate re: the XL7, not a statement from E-
> mu).
> > The extra headroom in the Xl7, Proteus etc is to allow for the
> extreme
> > bumps in volume that the filters (resonance) can cause. That makes
> > sense and I think you will see that the filters are capable of
> extreme
> > boosts in volume.
> >
> > But my recommendation is: if the S/PDIF sig is bothersome - use the
> > analog outs. Good D/A's on all the E-mu stuff... and hopefully you
> > have a good A/D in your setup (if you don't, you should.). You can
> > also just record the digital sig as-is and (as Aaron mentioned) -
> > Normalize, but I assume that you know that.
> >
> > Bottom line: don't let this interupt your creative flow - get on
> with
> > the music!
> >
> > happy toning,
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Mike-E" <d_jumpmaster@y...> wrote:
> > > AAArrrrgggghhhh!!!!
> > >
> > > I have tried to reach them by phone since I've posted the
> message.
> > > Several times a day. Everytime I get the voicemail of Monica.
> > >
> > > Damn Creative!
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the info!
> > > >
> > > > rEalm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike-E <d_jumpmaster@y...>
> > > > 02/19/2004 05:40 AM
> > > > Please respond to xl7
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> > > > cc:
> > > > Subject: [xl7] Weak S/PDIF output, known but non
> > > supported issue????
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello list,
> > > >
> > > > I just talked to Ruud van der Matte who works for Creative/E-mu
> > in
> > > > The Netherlands. I called him about the weak audio coming from
> > the
> > > > S/PDIF output compared to the signal coming form the analog
> main
> > > > output.
> > > >
> > > > The manual sais this is an exact copy from the main output. Well
> > my
> > > > ears and a level meter say it's almost half the Db's in volume.
> > So,
> > > > it's a problem with the S/PDIF implementation the E-mu.
> > > >
> > > > Ruud just talled me that he spoke to David Andersson from
> > > Creative/E-
> > > > mu in Dublin, and he talled him that it's a known issue BUT the
> > > > wan't do anything to fix it!
> > > >
> > > > I just called Creative/E-mu to speek to David Andersson myself,
> > but
> > > > I could not reach them. I got the voicemail of Monica and asked
> > if
> > > > the could call me back on this issue.
> > > >
> > > > Besides that Ruud van der Matte tolled me that the problem with
> a
> > > > disturbed S/PDIF output (grounding) was also a known issue. The
> > > last
> > > > machines that were released, have a workaround implemented.
> > > >
> > > > There were small copper plates placed between the top and
> bottom
> > > > cover, so both parts make better contact. That solved the
> problem
> > > on
> > > > the disturbed signal but not the weakness of the audio.
> > > >
> > > > I thought you should all know this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)
> or
> > > entity
> > > > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
> > > legally
> > > > privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person
> other
> > > than
> > > > the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive
> > > privilege
> > > > or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
> or
> > > other
> > > > use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> > information
> > > by
> > > > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
> you
> > > > receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> > > > material from any computer.
> > > >
> > > > For Translation:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]