Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare sequence
with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
Thanks

I like to use cubase to move pieces around in a
pattern or a song. But I usually do all the ground
work on the XL7. I think it it is really up to you and
which method you are most comfortable with. The more
tools that are available can always open up more
expressions into the final mix.

-Greg



--- Jean Kergutuil <jean.kergutuil@...> wrote:
> What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good
> way to prepare sequence
> with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7
> ??
> Thanks
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com

Work with Logic :-), in my option.

Richard

Am 17.09.2002 16:20 Uhr schrieb "Jean Kergutuil" unter
<jean.kergutuil@...>:

> What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare sequence
> with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 

-----------------------------------
Richard Zelzer

Internet:
http://www.zelzer.com
http://www.zhtml.de
http://www.zmac.de
http://www.zmusik.de

Just to add to the confusion, I'm gonna recommend Sonar.  I've tried 
almost all of the sequencers out there, and Sonar has the best MIDI 
implimentation in my opinion.  I tend to get the foundation beat set 
up in Sonar, where I can use groove quantizing and nifty stuff like 
that on a beat, and then record it into my command station.  After 
I've got a few measures uploaded I usually just cut and paste the 
measures using the hardware.  Also, since multi-channel recording 
doesn't work right *yet* in grid record mode, this lets me get around 
playing in real-time, which I suck at.  

sapo

--- In xl7@y..., "Jean Kergutuil" <jean.kergutuil@a...> wrote:
> What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare 
sequence
> with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
> Thanks

I'd like to add me two cents...
I've used just about everythign out there also, and I have found 
Sonar the best by far.  I do real-time recording almost exclusively, 
and Sonar has a very tight clock.  The SonarFX are quite good too.  
It can easily be used as a final step, mastering device also.

Good Luck !!

-payntar

--- In xl7@y..., "joesapo" <joesapo@y...> wrote:
> Just to add to the confusion, I'm gonna recommend Sonar.  I've 
tried 
> almost all of the sequencers out there, and Sonar has the best MIDI 
> implimentation in my opinion.  I tend to get the foundation beat 
set 
> up in Sonar, where I can use groove quantizing and nifty stuff like 
> that on a beat, and then record it into my command station.  After 
> I've got a few measures uploaded I usually just cut and paste the 
> measures using the hardware.  Also, since multi-channel recording 
> doesn't work right *yet* in grid record mode, this lets me get 
around 

> playing in real-time, which I suck at.  
> 
> sapo
> 
> --- In xl7@y..., "Jean Kergutuil" <jean.kergutuil@a...> wrote:
> > What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare 
> sequence
> > with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
> > Thanks

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jean Kergutuil" <jean.kergutuil@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: [xl7] CUBASE SX


> What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare sequence
> with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
> Thanks
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Is that a question a joke?

Any PC sequencer is better than MP7/XL7, not cause it
is bad, becausee you have the graphic interface.


--- divisionstreet13 <divisionstreet13@...> wrote:

<HR>
<html><body>


<tt>
<BR>
----- Original Message -----<BR>

From: "Jean Kergutuil"
<jean.kergutuil@...><BR>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com><BR>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:20 AM<BR>
Subject: [xl7] CUBASE SX<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
> What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good
way to prepare sequence<BR>
> with cubase or is it better to work only on the
XL7 ??<BR>
> Thanks<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:<BR>
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
</tt>

<br>

<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->

<table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2>
<tr bgcolor=#FFFFCC>
<td align=center><font size="-1"
color=#003399><b>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor</b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=#FFFFFF>
<td align=center width=470><table border=0
cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0> <tr> <td
align=center><font face=arial
size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT</font><br><a
href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=234081.2377872.3808768.2225242/D=egroupweb/S=1707709865:HM/A=1225249/R=0/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4547220;7007303;v?http://www.ameriquestmortgage.com/welcome.html?ad=Yahoo01"><img
src="http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/am/ameriquest/ronyahoo_clock_300x250.gif"
alt="" width="300" height="250"
border="0"></a></td></tr></table></td>
</tr>
<tr><td><img alt="" width=1 height=1
src="http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=234081.2377872.3808768.2225242/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=1225249/rand=227926010"></td></tr>
</table>

<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->


<br>
<tt>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<BR>
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<BR>
<BR>
</tt>
<br>

<br>
<tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms
of Service</a>.</tt>
</br>

</body></html>



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com

> Any PC sequencer is better than MP7/XL7, not cause it
> is bad, becausee you have the graphic interface.

What makes a sequencer with a graphic interface better (in some
objective sense) than, say, a sequencer integrated into a sound
generator with a lot of dedicated physical knobs and buttons?

The XL-7 sequencer beats the pants off Digital Performer for knocking
up and working with patterns, grooves and ideas really quickly, and
besides, not being a computer, it's not as distracting to the creative
process. Digital Performer is clearly superior for the real "heavy
lifting" of sequence recording and mixdown.

-- 

  nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com

Personally I love SX, it's ten billion times better than VST5 IMO. 
However, I will say that Steinberg is having some teething problems with 
the implementation of XP's direct music, and that some people have had 
issues with the MIDI Clock timing as a result (myself too, to a small 
extent).  So you can quite easily work on your patterns in SX (and use 
MIDI plug ins too!) but the timing MIGHT be off a bit, depending on your 
system.  Lot's more info at www.cubase.net forums.

rEalm





"Jean Kergutuil" <jean.kergutuil@...>
09/17/02 09:20 AM
Please respond to xl7

 
        To:     xl7@yahoogroups.com
        cc: 

        Subject:        [xl7] CUBASE SX


What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare sequence
with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
Thanks



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

I just got news that Apple has acquired Emagic. The news is that it 
will be discontinuiing the PC version Logic. So, if anyone is on 
there way out purchase Logic 5 for PC. Now would be the time to 
consider other packages. If you have a Mac and a PC, there is 
supposedly a free crossgrade to the Mac version.

-Greg


--- In xl7@y..., Richard.Zelzer@t... wrote:
> Work with Logic :-), in my option.
> 
> Richard
> 
> Am 17.09.2002 16:20 Uhr schrieb "Jean Kergutuil" unter
> <jean.kergutuil@a...>:
> 
> > What do you think about cubase sx ?? is it a good way to prepare 
sequence
> > with cubase or is it better to work only on the XL7 ??
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > xl7-unsubscribe@y...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> > 
> > 
> 
> -----------------------------------
> Richard Zelzer
> 
> Internet:
> http://www.zelzer.com
> http://www.zhtml.de
> http://www.zmac.de
> http://www.zmusik.de