Fw: [emulatorfive] E5 Status - E-mu Systems Health
2003-01-21 by David
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: <info@...> To: <emulatorfive@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:24 PM Subject: [emulatorfive] E5 Status - E-mu Systems Health Hi Project Phantom (aka Emulator 5) has been further delayed and it is unlikely to appear until mid 2003. The software sampler may get different features as a result, especially as E-mu Systems are very late to the software sampler market and need something to diffentiate them in the market. A possible new feature set of advanced Z-plane filters, RFX FX and Darwin FX utilising a new PCI "DSP" accelerator" card would make a lot of sense. I am sure the market research shows that a "me too" software sampler will not earn much revenue... We will have to wait an see. The downside is that a new PCI DSP card has to be a "closed platform", as Creative aren't too keen on open platforms, as it exposes their technology to competition. They hate this. The continued developed of new hardware based products from E-mu Systems depends on the availability of new DSP chips. Just next to them sits the Creative ATC (Advanced echnology Centre) which is pumping out new chips under the leadership of Dave Rossum - the Audigy 2 recently appeared as a full 192k/24-bit "G chip". However these chips are not so useful for pro music, even though the line between consumer and pro markets has got very thin recently. The R chip in the RFX was the last new chip to create a product at E-mu Systems, it was the basis of the aborted 1998 Mantis digital mixer. The ATC won't be building pro music chips, so E-mu have to re-use the ATC consumer chips. They can't easily use third party chips, as Creative would get upset. In any case there aren't many engineers at E-mu these days.. It is therefore improbably that E-mu Systems can get hold of new hardware, or the required R&D budget, so new Emulators are unlikely - hence why EOS will reach a pinnacle of development at 4.8 and stop. The hardware platform of the future is the PC/Mac with add in cards, because of economics and consumers. Building a new digital filter chips such as a H2 is an expensive idea. E-mu Systems will continue to leverage the existing platforms such as Protues 2000, and the Vintage Keys module was shown at NAMM2003, and there is maybe 1 or 2 more evolutions to be had on this platform. Even a new Proteus 3000 with faster processor and 24bit/192k digital outs, is feasible on paper - it just doesn't add much for the pro musician. The Proteus saved E-mu Systems in 1989, and it is still the cash cow that might just see them through to 2004. A Proteus 2000 on a PCI card is very feasible, but this still hasn't reached the market. This could be what the E5 mutates into... Creative own E-mu Systems, although the real reason they bought E-mu was to get Dave Rossum and his engineering skills. In 1992 this ownership gave birth to many fantastic products, but now its become a real constraint. E-mu tried to broaden their product lines in the mid 1990's and failed. The current business plan appears to be a slimming down to the basics, with a much slower rate of product development, until the market turns up. Hence the lack of "big" announcements, an SP12000 drum machine is never going to happen whilst Creative take the product development decisions. So there are two routes forward. 1)E-mu Systems remain with the Creative mothership and try and fight a somewhat rear guard action, but find it hard to attract the talented people and hardware needed - until.... a few sensible acquisitions by Creative inject some momentum - say a few US based software synth/sampler companies. This has to be done fast as Emagic and Steinberg have already been snapped up. We could then see the real blend of soft and hardware that I know the E-mu guys want to deliver. However its unlikely that Creative will ever buy companies outside its consumer area. Ensoniq was bought for its PCI interface, NOT its music technology. 2)E-mu Systems detachs from the mothership via a Management Buy Out and gets new financial backing. The deal would be difficult to achieve because Creative want to own the technology patents - Rossums hard work. The brand name, staff and library of samples are easy to prise from Creative, but the G chip? It would have to be done on a licensed basis, and ideally join up with a software synth/sampler company - like Antares across the street. The new company would be small, highly customer focused and fully aware that it was a niche market and not a \ufffd100m revenue earner. A US version of Waldorf is what we are taking about. All other routes lead backwards. Regards Rob The Emulator Archive www.emulatorarchive.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: emulatorfive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/