Xpantastic! group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Xpantastic!

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:44 UTC

Message

Re: [xpantastic] The pure size of the Matrix-12

2012-07-16 by Omar

before purchasing my Xpander, a good friend of mine let me borrow his Matrix-12 and about the only use case I found the detune to be very nice was when programming pads/strings. with a subtle amount on each of the twelve voices, you get this really nice organic subtle change in thickness and harmonic color when playing chords. this in combination with rotate mode, the same note played never sounds the same twice.

while the same results can be achieved with the Xpander, it's much more cumbersome and not as accessible.

-o



On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Terje Winther <terje.winther@wintherstormer.no> wrote:

> I have owned a M12 for a long time. I find the modulation List a
> great thing,
> but I don't see the detune as that much of an advantage, unless
> you just gotta have a "Hover" type sound.
>
"Hover" type sound! Funny name, but true!
I am too old to be into techno detuned sound (it really sounds "out of
tune" for me), but now and then I have patched up my modulars and
monophonic analogs in a massive collective sound. The idea came from a
reading of what Rick Wright in Pink Floyd did, overdubbing his
minimoog multiple times so he had like 18-20 VCOs sounding. You need
to be careful to really have everything in tune, and play well (or use
sequencers), and you can achive a slightly different sound. It is a
lot of work just to get a slightly different sound, but can be worth
while, as long as you don“t overdo it.


> Often I have adjusted the detunes to what I think is a perfect
> sound, only to
> reset them all to 0 once I play the sound with a band or midi
> sequence context .
>

I agree: detuning should be used very subtly.


Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.