How about a "full-screen" editor running "endlessly" under Linux on an old laptop with some simple serial MIDI interface? If the editor were entirely keyboard driven, and the laptop could suspend/hibernate successfully when the lid were closed, you could think of it as a "hardware editor". You could even re-label the keys! ;) I'm interested in your comparison of the Xpander and the Pulse, as I've always fancied a Pulse+. In the meantime I have a Super BassStation, but you don't hear people rave about those the way they do with the Waldorf. One of these days I will write the ultimate Xpander patch editor. When my children have grown some more... And that Solaris is a tasty piece of kit. Cheers, John :^P envia94 wrote: > > > Thanks for the link to the Waldorf Pulse editor. Pulse is one of my > favourites too, but still > Oberheims sound much better in their own way. There are probably so few > Xpanders left in > comparison to Pulses that in comparison it would not very well pay off > to make a VST editor > for Xpander. > > On the other hand, a simple general hardware editor would do fine, I, > for example, don't > want to take the time and efforts of using computers all the time. I > prefered a simple and > quick interface like that of the John Boven's Solaris to be released in > the near future. Maybe > that's the way to go after Xpander and Matrix-12. Still I think, I'll > 'never' sell mine, because > they cannot but getting rarer and rarer. > > Take a look! > http://www.johnbowen.com/ <http://www.johnbowen.com/> > > Best regards, > Tiitu. -- John Pallister john@...
Message
Re: [xpantastic] Hardware Editor, or, why not a Solaris ...
2008-04-03 by John Pallister
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.