Xpantastic! group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Xpantastic!

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:44 UTC

Message

Re: [xpantastic] OB8 versus Xpander

2008-08-10 by Jeremy Smith

William Cason wrote:
> I had an OB-8 once, no MIDI. Now I have an M12.  I haven't put the two 
> side by side, but I haven't missed anything soundwise from the OB-8 to 
> the M12, in fact it's got so much more modulation stuff I would def 
> not trade it for the OB-8.  Plus, the 12-part multitimbrality and 12 
> ind outs is much better than the two-part, two output OB-8 (I always 
> use multi-timbral, multi mode, ind outs).
>  
> Maybe I'm wrong cause I never put the two side by side, anyone else?
>
Hi,

Thanks, I guess the KLF used multitracking and sequencing to get 
multitimbrality out of the OB-8.

I hope this wasn't a too-FAQ-ey question. I guess the answer is, there 
is a difference, but given they both cost a grand, the Xpander has more 
places to go. Also, you have to limit your options when programming the 
Xpander.

I heard the Noise Professor's Xpander tracks, and I hope I can get that 
kind of sound from it.

As for my first analog synth, I had a Crumar Bit One, then a Matrix 
1000, but the Xpander was my first non-DCO synth.

Cheers,

Jeremy.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.