Xpantastic! group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Xpantastic!

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:44 UTC

Message

Re: [xpantastic] Re: Transfering Matrix1000 patchs over to an Xpander?

2008-08-12 by PeWe

>>>

Tony Cappellini schrieb:


> The most important difference is, M1K deals different w/ waveforms and the
> waveshaping parameter decides which kind of waveform the oscillator creates
> in the end,- this is what a Xpander and Matrix 12 cannot do.

Why?








I think the pulse width of all the waves is affected in the M1K, - am I wrong ???




> As mentioned before in another post, - I did this programming,-
> Xpander>Matrix and vice versa manually for some patches and IMO, this was
> one of my most time consuming and boring programming experiences fo all the
> time because of all the comparison.

Why ? XPander single patches will go directly into an M12 via sysex.










Missunderstanding: I meant Xpander to Matrix 1000

Buy a sustain pedal ... :-)))))))))))



I dont even have a sustain pedal ;-)

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.