Xpantastic! group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Xpantastic!

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:44 UTC

Message

[xpantastic] Re: Synthesiser audio (musician's) feedback as important as technological brilliance? (theory)

2008-08-26 by Seth Elgart

At 12:02 PM +0000 8/26/08, Karl wrote:
>MOTM was one of the few still making electronic kits, with a quality I
>have never seen before and probably will never see again. It just bums
>me out,

Well, you're absolutely right about the quality thing, and I am also 
bummed out about it. However, if it's a choice between more and 
better modules on the one hand and kits on the other, I'll be able to 
live without the kits.


>and I got carried away.

I have no problem with getting carried away at all!


>My apologies

None needed. I just wanted to make sure everyone knew that MOTM was 
still alive and well and thriving.




          Seth




http://www.edgetonerecords.com/elgart.html - new album
http://www.ilike.com/artist/Seth+Elgart - next album
http://www.myspace.com/sethelgart
http://boxoftextures.blogspot.com/ - thoughts on music blog  <--New

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.