At 12:02 PM +0000 8/26/08, Karl wrote:
>MOTM was one of the few still making electronic kits, with a quality I
>have never seen before and probably will never see again. It just bums
>me out,
Well, you're absolutely right about the quality thing, and I am also
bummed out about it. However, if it's a choice between more and
better modules on the one hand and kits on the other, I'll be able to
live without the kits.
>and I got carried away.
I have no problem with getting carried away at all!
>My apologies
None needed. I just wanted to make sure everyone knew that MOTM was
still alive and well and thriving.
Seth
http://www.edgetonerecords.com/elgart.html - new album
http://www.ilike.com/artist/Seth+Elgart - next album
http://www.myspace.com/sethelgart
http://boxoftextures.blogspot.com/ - thoughts on music blog <--NewMessage
[xpantastic] Re: Synthesiser audio (musician's) feedback as important as technological brilliance? (theory)
2008-08-26 by Seth Elgart