Xpantastic!

Wow, 

I´m personally not "obsessed" with faster envelopes on my Matrix 12, I 
rather get reminded of it whenever I play it, don´t need a scope for 
that. It´s so fxxing great, but would be even greater with faster 
envelopes IMHO.

I have some really fast machines like the P5 and the Minimoog D, so 
it´s not like I have to get the M12 faster.

None of the machines I have are "perfect", in fact I have mods thought 
out for most of them, but that´s the way I am I guess :)
I´m gonna syncmod the Mini next...hope that´s not like cursing in 
church :)

When I have the time, I will start out by change the resistors on one 
of the voiceboards like Mr Doidic suggested. After all, it worked out 
on the SE-1. 

Cheerio







--- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Cappellini" <cappy2112@...> 
wrote:
>
> I personally do not understand this general obsession with making
> >
> > envelopes faster, the Xpander is perfection itself. It the real 
world
> > the basses sound fine, gorgeous in fact, I love them..If you are
> > actually sitting down with a scope analysing speeds of enevelopes on
> > these machines, I personally think you've lost it. You need to
> > actually play it more, write some songs, use it as an instrument. 
You
> > change stuff in it, you will ruin the sound I guarantee it.
> 
> 
> One does not need a scope to experience the slow envelopes on the
> Xpander, it is plainly audible.
> The same goes for the OB8.
>