I'm not responding to take issue with your opinions. Your opinions are valid as yours. I would, however, like to point out that 24 minute envelopes (12 minute rise/12 minute fall) are possible on the 249 and 16 minute on the 250. These times are potentially much longer when multiplied by an external voltage. > 281e's lowest frequency (when used as an lfo) is not low enough for > the kinds of slow, evolving drones I sometimes aim for. I also would > like to have a voltage mixer/attenuator that would allow me fine, > continuous scaling (instead of the stepped, coarse attenuation we get > from the 210e or the 256e).
Message
Longer envelope duration (Was: 261e or 259e capable of higher frequencies?)
2008-09-28 by mritenburg