On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:01 AM, cray5656 <amni56@tpg.com.au> wrote: > arent the 256e and 210e doing the same thing with regards to voltage > mixing ? If I use the 210e and have 3 CV inputs sent to output 1 thats > voltage mixing isnt it? the 210e allows fully arbitrary but basically non-dynamic mixing of mabny sources and destinations (8x5) the 256e can do dynamic (cv-controlled) scaling, inversion, and fades between (two) cv sources. pretty different... > I have 6 panels left and I am trying to decide what I need > > Cynthia Zoe > Model 225e > Model 256e > Model 285e the 256e seems kindof useless here because you have very few cv sources. i guess i would go with a 291e, which does lots of stuff. > I like the idea of the 225e but am not interested in playing it in a > conventional note system..has someone done a youtube vid of the 225e > not set up like an abstract piano? i don't have any videos, but i've used it for all kinds of stuff. with a computer, it becomes simply a means to produce arbitrary externally-controlled pulses and cvs (limited by MIDI resolution). i used it as the brains for a pretty gnarly abstract 4panel feedback patch at the last NAMM...
Message
Re: [200e] 256e and 210e arent they doing the same thing?
2008-11-14 by ezra buchla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.