i personally prefer a 18-12 configuration for the simple reason that i carry my system around quite often, and it's great to be able to have a more compact "live" setup in a 201e 12, while still having plenty of space in the studio within a 201e 18. Also, ( I might be wrong) I think you wouldn't be able to have a 206e and a 225e in the same hypothetical 24 space case, and if i remember well a 225e or 206e alone won't be able to save settings for 24 modules.... A. On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:13 PM, cuari7 wrote: > Yes, you're right about this. But it would still be wonderful to have > the option of a few non preset-devoted modules (like the beautiful > 255) > for those of us who are not interested in saving module settings. > > Now, switching gears toward the 24-module cabinet option: this would > certainly be a fantastic option for some of us with this bad case of > buchlaholism. Think of how beautiful it would look!! > > jd > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, "ezra buchla" <ezra.buchla@...> wrote: >> >> i do not concur >> >> presets dude >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [200e] Re: new 200e modules
2008-11-17 by Alessandro Cortini
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.