200e

208e would be really tempting but i would prefer a 296e

jb

2008/11/23 Chris Muir <cbm@well.com>:
>
> Let me play devil's advocate for a minute. Much as I would love to see
> an 208 reissue or reinterpretation, couldn't similar functionality be
> had in similar space with existing 200e modules? It seems to me that
> the combo of a 261e, 282e, 292e and the new 206e fits in the same
> space as the Easel, and generates a similar sonic palette, and
> provides presets, too, albeit ones that you can't fondle.
>
> There are a handful of important things missing when trying to
> recreate the 208 in the same panel space: random voltages, sequencer /
> pulser, spring reverb, envelope detector, and doubtless some things
> I'm forgetting.
>
> What are the reasons people would like to see a 208e? What are the
> features of the original 208 that would make you want a reissue?
>
> For me, they include:
>  - immediate control of a nice little voice architecture
>  - sliders provide fast manipulation of multiple parameters
> simultaneously
>  - uncorrelated random outputs a really nice touch
>
> -C
>
> Chris Muir
> cbm@well.com
> http://www.xfade.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>