On Dec 29, 2008, at 9:13 AM, derwskee wrote: > Looking at the new 285e I am not sure I know the sonic difference > between Ring Mod and Balanced Mod...I know what Ring Mod does. > I had always considered the terms Balanced Modulator and Ring Modulator synonyms, myself. I thought that this referred to circuits that created sum and difference tones, while suppressing the carrier & modulator, as opposed to AM where the carrier is still present. The 261e AM section goes from AM into ring modulation, so I imagine that the 285e circuit does something similar > Also > curious of the internal vs external reference functions: when set ot > Internal does this provide an internal Modulator signal that can > itself > be FM/CV modulated... > Yes, there is an internal oscillator (actually two: one for the freq shifter and one for the balanced mod section), which can be pitched around and FMed. - C Chris Muir cbm@well.com http://www.xfade.com
Message
Re: [200e] Ring vs. Balanced Modulation
2008-12-29 by Chris Muir
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.